Opinion
Disagree with your neighbor? Don't just stew over it; write about it. Flag as Inappropriate
Posts awaiting your approval 0
Frank H. Robles May 17, 2013 at 06:34 pm
He should have been locked up with buddy "Duke Cunningham", they both took money from the…Read More same contractor, who's also in Jail...!!!
BlueAngel2 May 17, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Just for the record, all anyone has to do is familiarize themselves with Issa's past. He is NOT…Read More squeaky clean by any means.
BlueAngel2 May 17, 2013 at 06:12 pm
All of this CRAP will backfire on the Republican party....you read it here first.
Lynn Marr May 17, 2013 at 03:47 am
On the contrary, Mr Lees is a scientist and offers a true scientific perspective. The environmental…Read More review for the Army Corps of Engineers project was not completed before the agenda item was heard by Council. Public comments and public agency comments have not yet been addressed. The mitigated negative impact declarations for previous sand replenishment projects were not made after complete environmental review. Supposedly, because of the "mitigation," complete review was not required, as in a full EIR. So you are comparing apples to oranges, Mr. Stocks. Please don't attack Mr. Lees, personally. You are welcome to share your own conclusions or understandings, but please don't mislead or misrepresent by promoting your agenda, while falsely claiming Mr. Lees "and his ilk" are not "dealing in good faith."
Jerome Stocks May 16, 2013 at 09:45 pm
Mr. Lees once again uses "sounds like science" garbage and flawed logic to promote his…Read More perverse perspective. He's done it before...
Nobody dealing in good faith can actually oppose putting sand on our beaches, especially given how much actual science shows a lack of negative environmental impact from previous sand replenishment projects.
Mr. Lees and his ilk are just sad puppies.
Women Do Not Have Equal Rights
1 Recommend Jac Flanders