.
Feedback

Encinitas Dogs Who Bring Home the Bacon

Some local business owners bring man’s best friend to work every day—and it’s part of a growing trend.

For the past seven years, visitors to historic downtown Encinitas have been welcomed by Marley, a yellow Labrador retriever who sits diligently in front of , across the street from the . Nearby office workers, including mayors and city council members, often find an excuse to take a quick break from their responsibilities to give Marley a scratch behind her ear.

“Marley’s a landmark,” said Marco San Antonio, owner of One Day Signs. “Each day there are fifty people here to see her, sometimes more.

“When customers call, they’ll say ‘Is this the shop with the dog?’ After fieldtrips, teachers bring their students to pet Marley.”

A few blocks away, a miniature Australian shepherd name Lucy provides entertainment and stress relief to customers and employees of at the Lumberyard.

“I grew up in New England where people had shop dogs,” owner Jim O’Hara explained. “Lucy gives our customers insight into who we are as a community store.”

O’Hara estimates that about 90 percent of patrons enjoy having Lucy at the store. In consideration for the other 10 percent, Lucy only works part-time, three times a week.

In her off hours, she assists O’Hara as coach of the Seaside Striders Running Club, a pastime they now share. Lucy was a stray—who was later determined to have been severely abused—who met O’Hara when she bolted from a bush in Rancho Santa Fe he had just passed and, without missing a beat, joined him for the rest of his run.

“Monday night she comes for a three-mile run with our group,” he said. “When she doesn’t come, people ask ‘Where’s Lucy?’ She has no problem with an eleven-mile run. When I take her hiking to Mammoth Mountain, she can go for hours.”

Dogs are becoming increasingly visible in the American workplace because of their ability to reduce stress and increase job satisfaction for employees, according to a study earlier this year by Virginia Commonwealth University.

Some of the nation’s largest employers are dog friendly, including Amazon.com and Google.com.

A survey in 2008 by the American Pet Products Association also revealed support for pets in the workplace:

  • 75 million Americans believe having pets in the workplace makes people happier.
  • 70 million Americans believe having pets in the workplace reduces stress.
  • 47 million Americans believe having pets in the workplace leads to a more creative environment.
  • 37 million believe having pets in the workplace decreases absenteeism.
  • 41 million believe having pets in the workplace helps co-workers get along better.
  • 46 million believe having pets in the workplace creates a more productive work environment.
  • 23 million believe having pets in the workplace decreases smoking in the workplace.
  • 34 million people who bring their pets to the workplace work longer hours.

Tiffani and Sean Sauter, owners of in the shopping center off El Camino Real, bring their yellow Labrador retriever, Lola, to the store on weekdays when they work together.

“People like her being here,” Tiffani Sauter said. “When they come in on Saturday and Sunday, they’ll say, ‘Where’s the dog?’”

Sean Sauter describes Lola as a magnet, who draws pet lovers into the store just for a visit.

“Lola’s a great babysitter for kids (of customers), and gives me a break from the stresses of retail life,” he added.

Two doors down, Kobe, a Chihuahua, bears the title of “Official Treat Tester” at her parents’ pet food store, Pupologie.

“She likes everything,” Brendan Clifton said. “If it’s food, she wants it.”

Clifton said he’s noticed an upward trend in pet-friendly work environments in San Diego.

“I know quite a few people including manufacturers of our favorite dog brand, The Honest Kitchen, who bring their pups to work,” he explained.

Like Sauter, Clifton says Kobe is a welcome respite from the stresses of business.

“Sometimes it’ll seem like a long day and I’ll say, ‘Hey, I’m just taking the dog out for a little walk.’ It’s an excuse to take a break and get a little sunshine.”

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter

laurie michaels July 17, 2012 at 12:08 pm
Don't forget the Seaside Bazaar! Several of us bring our doggies. Come meet Lovely Gypsy with her beautiful black fur and soulful eyes, and Sami the adorable Cairn "terror". Both rescues by the way. And visitors with friendly dogs are always welcome.
Noida July 17, 2012 at 03:12 pm
Enjoyed this article....this is another form of relieving stress.....giving dogs, especially Marley a scratch. It's just like when people tell you....stop and smell the roses. Thank you.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Mary E June 19, 2013 at 04:01 pm
do you get a donation receipt for tax purposes?
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.