.
Feedback

Studio Summer Art Camp: A Place for Messy Hands and Open Minds

Nancy Gordon's camp in Cardiff is a summertime highlight in our home.

Last year I back on our summer-camp experiences and made copious notes to self about items such as, "#3: 'cooking camp' doesn’t involve actual cooking, unless jello counts", and "#7:there is a big difference between a 6-year old boy and a 4-year-old girl, especially in games involving the physics of force."

This year I want to highlight one of our better experiences, a camp my daughter and her family members look forward to again this summer: Nancy Gordon’s Studio Summer Art Camp, of Cardiff. I say my daughter looks forward to it, because she adores the time she spends at Nancy Gordon’s idyllic garden studios, working with clay, paints, jewelry and mixed media. I say her family, because we’re the ones who benefit from the lovely work she brings home.

I'll admit that much of the art I have up from my 5-year-old is displayed merely out of pride and nepotism. Although sometimes her intuitive aesthetics do make up for lack of technique. But the work from Nancy Gordon’s is almost always phenomenal. The clay and homemade paper lamp my little one made, at 4-and-a-half, is one of my favorite lights I’ve ever owned.

Too, my daughter treasures her time with the camp's “big girls,”  the junior-highschoolers Ms. Gordon brings on to help the little ones along. And she marvels at seeing the workings of a kiln, bead-room, and throwing wheel, among other magic afoot in the fairy-garden-like setting Ms. Gordon has created.

I got the opportunity to visit these gardens just recently and ask Ms. Gordon some questions about how the camp got started. She told me about her lack of formal art training and how she first took a clay class while pregnant with her son 41 years ago. “I actually went to class on Tuesday, had him on Wednesday, and went to class on Thursday, with him of course,” she recalled. Soon then began selling pottery at clay sales, and supported herself and her son this way for 15 years.

At the same time, she said, “My personal art evolved through Book Arts...my clay 'books' let me use clay, words, cloth, paper, junk etc. in one piece.  These have been shown at The Athenaeum in La Jolla, The Oceanside Museum of Art, The Center for the Book (in New York and SF) and the Woman Made Gallery in Chicago to name a few.” In the late 70s and early 80s she received four grants from The California Arts Council as an Artist in the Community (Pala Indian Reservation), and Schools (Chollas Elementary and Chula Vista Schools).

Ms. Gordon started teaching art by contributing at her son’s schools and has now taught at the Rhoades School for 25 years. “My camp is special in my opinion,” she told me, “because I allow creativity, both artistically and emotionally, to take its own course. I like to give people the skills they need to make anything. Then I have as much of a hands off approach as possible...The kids create something amazing with their hands and their beings.”

After we spoke, I realized she’d hit the nail on the head. For me, as a parent, what I value most about the experience my child gets at Studio Summer Art Camp is that it is her experience, alone. No one seems to be telling her what to do in a way that she notices she’s being taught anything at all. Rather, she’s being given tools and ideas to expand and embody her own well of creativity, so endless inside of her right now, and so crucial to growth in so many areas of her life.

But if you ask my daughter she’ll just tell you, “It’s fun to get my hands so messy at Ms. Nancy’s place,” and as far as I’m concerned, that’s all she needs to know.

If you’re interested in joining in the fun, please contact Nancy Gordon at 760.479.0076 or visit their website. They offer weeklong sessions from mid-June through August, and provide a full or half day program for ages 4-14.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Jessica June 18, 2012 at 02:08 am
Nancy Gordon's studio is a wonderous place. And Nancy is real gem of an art teacher! Definitely one of summer's highlights for my daughters, both as campers and as older helpers.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Mary E June 19, 2013 at 04:01 pm
do you get a donation receipt for tax purposes?
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.