.
Feedback

Correcting Dog Behavior Issues: An Untraditional Approach

'Ms. Dolittle' taught me what my dog was trying to tell me.

I recently decided that I really needed to call the number on the newspaper clipping, tapped to my refrigerator for months. For those of you who have had a pet with an ongoing “issue”, you might relate to my story. In this case, my beautiful, cute, shiny black cocker spaniel looked like an angel but acted like a devil. Our relaxing walks, on local trials, inevitably turned into a nightmare whenever another dog passed our path. I had tried all sorts of training and socializing to help him over-come his aggression and anti-social behavior toward other dogs. Each time, I mentally attempted to determine a pattern to his madness but found none. Big dogs, small dogs, dogs on-leash, dogs off-leash, old dogs, young dogs, one dog or dogs in groups: all equally elicited his growling response.  Talk about embarrassing. People went from, “Oh what a beautiful dog”, to running in the other direction.

Seeking peace during our leisurely meanderings, I turned to a pet psychic. First, I will give you some background on Ms.Dolittle, AKA Brigitte Noel, and then I will relate the story of my psychic adventure with my little dog Slate.

Her name is Brigitte Noel, a warm and mild mannered woman living in Hillcrest. Her path to becoming an animal communication liaison, so to speak, is an interesting one. In her younger years, Brigitte moved quite often but found her animals a constant source of peace and comfort.  Her love of animals, and an open mind to the metaphysical world, encouraged her to seek out a woman named Samantha Khury.  As a fellow local, with similar interests, Khury showed Noel how it was possible to tap into an animal’s thoughts through telepathy.  Brigitte started her own journey by learning all she could, about all animals, from dogs and cats to lizards, birds, ferrets, horses and everything in-between.  She started developing her skills on her own menagerie of pets and branched out to other’s beloved companions. 

After arriving at Ms. Noel’s home, Slate happily jumped up the steps leading to Brigitte’s office. He seemed excited to have his side of the story revealed through this animal interpreter to me, his loving owner.

I introduced myself to Ms. Noel as Slate looked around and sniffed out his new surroundings. It was not long before he was lying down, totally relaxed and ready to relay his story. The session was tapped, and later send to me via e-mail. Both Brigitte and Slate were quiet but intent throughout their “silent” exchange. Ms. Noel wrote on a pad quickly and largely, with exclamations and underlines during the more than 60-minute exchange. I sat quietly watching. I will say that Slate looked up at me, right at the start of the session, and “mouthed” what I can only imagine was a “thank you” for allowing him to express his feelings and wishes.  I promise I only had coffee and cereal for breakfast.

Come to find out, Slate has no interest in playing or socializing with the dogs we meet on our walks. He likes his people and does not like other dogs. All those well meaning owners wanting their dog to say “hello” to Slate were not welcome and unappreciated. Ditto dogs that come bounding up to him, jumping around like crazy, and getting in his face. No, no, and no thank you. Our new routine is to ignore. I tell the other owner that my dog is in training and if they could just walk by and ignore us, it would be very helpful. Slate gets to ignore the other dogs and we both focus on our own time together, sans interaction with other walkers. I know it sounds a bit out there. I hesitated to write this blog but, I have to admit, our walks are much calmer and Slate really seems to appreciate my new appreciation and acceptance of his anti-social preference. Another tip from Brigitte, no cell phones. I focus on Slate and stay fully aware of his state of mind.  I think I am starting to get this communication without words down. Maybe I can apply it to my children next?

For more information about Brigitte Noel’s work, you can visit her web site.

Sharon March 23, 2012 at 05:16 pm
Thank you for sharing

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Mary E June 19, 2013 at 04:01 pm
do you get a donation receipt for tax purposes?
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.