.
Feedback

Washing Dishes the Green Way

What's the most environnmentally-conscious way to wash dishes?

Where did you learn how to do housework? If you’re like me, you learned a little from a college roommate about how she gets her whites so clean, a bit from an old boyfriend about getting closer to the dirt while scrubbing floors. But for the most part, you learned from your family of origin. Which means that you may be cleaning your home using methods from a bygone era.

So what? How much has changed when it comes to getting things clean, you may ask. If anything we’ve gotten worse, not better as a nation, at keeping house. But one thing that has changed greatly is our attention to the environment. Phosphates have been taken out of most dishwashing detergents, chlorine bleach alternatives have hit the market, and everything, everything we do, has become about using as little water as possible.

This is especially true in Southern California, where water conservation is essential to survival. Livia Borak of the environmental Coast Law Group puts it this way, “San Diego is at the end of the pipe for both the State Water Project and Colorado River Aqueduct. With climate change exacerbating our water supply shortages, we simply can't afford to waste any water.”

I began thinking about this while watching a friend do dishes the other day. Her method was so foreign to me that I couldn’t even help her prep the plates. While I was rinsing, she was scrubbing, and we were both totally out of sync. I began to question which one of us was being more efficient and what, ultimately, is the most environmentally conscious way to do the dishes–a task I will admit to learning sometime at the end of the '70s.

After some poking around the Internet, I found that using a fully loaded dishwasher, especially an energy efficient one, is the greenest way to get your dishes clean. That’s what a recent survey by researchers at Bonn University in Germany concluded. The tested brand was Energy Star certified and estimated to have a nine-year life span. When compared to a dishwasher, washing dishes by hand costs $431 more per year, used 5,000 more gallons of water, and takes about 231 hours of your personal time. So a dishwasher is about 37 percent more efficient compared to human hands.

But this is only true if you have an energy efficient and state-of-the art machine. Regardless of what your home appliances are like, here is a breakdown of the greenest ways to wash dishes, which means using the least amount of soap as well as water.

Dishwasher Method:

  1. Try to use an Energy Star certified dishwasher that requires very little pre-scrubbing of dishes. Simply scrape off extra foods and place the dishes in the machine. If something has burned onto a pan, or there is protein cooked onto it, soak the pan and then do it by hand.
  2. If you have a dishwasher that requires some pre-cleaning of the dishes, first scrape with the utensils you used while eating. Fruits, veggies, grains and egg shells can go in the compost, while meats, dairy and other proteins (like tofu and eggs) go in the trash. Try not to use the garbage disposal because it takes so much running water to run.
  3. Next load the dishes that look clean enough in to the dishwasher and pre-clean the others with a wet scrubber sponge. Again, try not to run the water and use it’s force as a food remover when a scrubber would work just as well. If you only have a few to do like this, running the water to get the last bits off is ok, otherwise, fill one side of the sink, or a rinse basin, with just a couple of inches of water to remove anything left on the dishes and put them in the dishwasher.

 

To some, if you are going to go through all this work it’s easier just to wash these dishes by hand in the first place. Also, some people do not own a dishwasher.

 Hand-washing Method:

  1. Fill one side of a sink, or a rinse basin, with very hot water (if it isn’t hot, you won’t be able to get maximum suds for minimum soap) and just a 1/2 teaspoon of soap. Scrub the dishes, start with the cleanest dishes first (glasses) and finish with pots and pans. To avoid greasy dishes, make sure to add a little more soap once the suds seem deflated.
  2. Then, most environmental sites I read suggested putting the dishes in a rinse basin (or other side of the sink) filled with warm to hot water, changing the water when required.
  3. For some this seems like rinsing dishes in dirty water after a short time. If you feel this way, rinse the dishes under running water but do it quickly and in an organized fashion. Once you start using less soap, you will find you need less rinsing.
Yapo August 4, 2012 at 01:42 am
Great subject to bring up Abi!!! I hand wash pots & pans, but dishwasher the plates, utensils, bowls and whatever plastics I can fit in thereafter. When I hand wash the pots & pans, I have a smaller pot to catch all the rinse off water and have a larger stock pot next to me on the ground to pour "used" water in.
Once I'm done "doing" dishes, I take the pot with all the "diverted water" and either water an area in the backyard that needs it or pour it into a "storage" bin for my compost piles. Thought I'd toss in something to be even "greener" ... Good on ya!!! ~Yapo
Jay Berman August 4, 2012 at 09:39 pm
I got tired of lousy dishwasher performance ... figured out that it was because phophates were removed from most brands because a number of states banned it (not CA) Finish still contains phophates and works perfectly .... clean dishes again ..
Crystal August 6, 2012 at 01:19 pm
In search of eco-friendly dishwasher detergent that actually works and after much trial and error, I use "Method Smarty Dishwasher Tabs" (1/2 tab in pre-wash and main wash compartment) and "Lemishine Original Dishwasher Detergent Additive" (1/2 tsp in each compartment) in my energy- and water-efficient dishwasher. Neither cleaner has phosphates and my dishes are amazingly clean and spot-free. Thanks for the great article!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.