.
Feedback

Google Drive: When Clouds Jump On A Bandwagon

The center of our digital lives soon will no longer be the personal computer, but the personal cloud.

Is it possible for clouds to have a bandwagon? It sure seemed as if there were a lot of them jumping on a bandwagon over the last several days, and Google was driving it.

The tech giant finally launched its Google Drive last week, after rumors for several years that it would be getting into the cloud-computing business. That had all kinds of cloud storage and application providers coming out with announcements of their own, not wanting to be lost in the fog.

Microsoft even managed to make an announcement a day ahead of Google about "improvements" to its SkyDrive service that actually amounted to a cut in the amount of storage space offered free to new users, from 25 GB down to 7 GB—still more than Google's 5 GB, but a cut nonetheless. To be fair, there were improvements in SkyDrive's functionality and interoperability, and the cut likely was meant mainly to bring Microsoft's service more in line with other providers.

Besides Google and Microsoft, there have been announcements or leaks over the last several days by Dropbox, Box.com, Hewlett-Packard, Samsung and LG. Some of the other players include Amazon's Cloud Drive, Apple's iCloud and Dropbox rival SugarSync. Mobile-device vendors HTC and Asus are, like Samsung and LG, also in the cloud business, as an added value to promote their smartphones and tablets.

Typically these work on a PC with an app that creates a special folder which, when a user drops a file into it, is synced to cloud storage and to any other devices registered to that account, whether another PC, a smartphone or tablet. Usually there are iPhone and/or Android apps for easily accessing the cloud through a mobile device.

Considering there had been speculation about Google getting into the business for four or five years, Google Drive seems a remarkably average offering, with price being its main selling point compared with a service like Dropbox, which helped define the category. Google Drive offers five gigabytes of free storage, with upgrades to 25 GB for $2.99 a month or 100 GB for $4.99.

And just what is that category? Wikipedia defines cloud computing as "a metaphor used by Technology or IT Services companies for the delivery of computing requirements as a service to a heterogeneous community of end-recipients."

If you don't have the foggiest notion of what that means, let's try it this way: It's taking a function usually performed by your computer and moving it instead to a server off in some nebulous location somewhere, in a cloud.

So Google Docs or Apple iWork or Microsoft Office 365 are web-based cloud applications that take the place of productivity suites like Microsoft Office that otherwise would reside on your computer. Netflix or iTunes videos or Amazon Instant Streaming are cloud replacements for your DVD or Blu-ray player.

The hot offering currently is storage, moving music, photos, videos or work documents to a cloud drive instead of your computer's hard drive. Increasingly, cloud storage and cloud applications are linked, so files stored on Google Drive or Apple's iCloud can be opened and worked in Google Docs or Apple iWork.

That in fact may be Google Drive's biggest advantage, its integration. If you use Gmail, soon you'll be able to save or send attachments directly to and from Google Drive. Google supports viewing or modifying up to 30 different file types, so, for instance, you can view a native Adobe Photoshop file in your web browser even though you don't have Photoshop installed on your computer.

For a lot of everyday work, Google and other providers are making your home computer barely relevant – you only need to be able to access the web, and all the other computing work can be done through an app launched within a browser.

Which is partly the point. Much of what is driving the explosion in cloud computing, besides lower prices for storage, is the explosion in mobile devices. What started as services aimed at being able to access work files on a computer at home or on the road now are directed at enabling smartphones and tablets, with their limited storage and horsepower, to do things for which we used to need a computer.

"Explosion" is not used lightly to describe cloud computing's growth. Leading technology-research firm Gartner predicts in a new report that by 2014, the "personal cloud" will replace the "personal computer" as the center of most digital interactions. By 2015, cloud services will be on 90 percent of personal technology devices, whether PC, smartphone, tablet or even smart TV. Consumers will be able to store, connect, stream or synchronize content across any of those platforms and at different locations.

It's the decline of one PC and the rise of another, the personal cloud.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.