.
Feedback

The Five Most Frequently Asked Questions About Dogs—Answered

The veterinarians at The Drake Center solve your most common canine concerns.

Why is my dog so itchy? 

Itchiness is often the result of a flea bite. Since we live in a warm climate here in San Diego, our pets are at risk for getting fleas year-round. The best defense is to keep your pet on a year-round product, like Sentinel, to prevent and treat flea infestations. Some dogs may also have atopy, which is inhalant, and/or a contact allergy. Dogs can be allergic to one or many of the things that humans are allergic to, such as molds and pollens. Symptoms can range from mild to severe, depending on the environmental conditions and the response from the dog. Your dog may also develop secondary skin infections that require medication.

Why does my dog scoot? 

Scooting is typically caused by full or impacted anal sacs. Dogs have two scent glands under their tail and when these become overly full, they can put pressure on the anus.  This discomfort causes the dog to scoot his/her bottom on the floor. The dog is trying to relieve the pressure of the anal sac fluid. If your dog scoots, please bring him/her to the veterinarian to have the anal sacs expressed. If the material in the sacs is not expressed on a regular basis, the sac may rupture, causing a severe skin infection. Most dogs express their own anal sacs with each bowel movement and many owners are unaware that these sacs are even present.   

Why does my dog eat cat/rabbit feces? 

Dogs are descendents of the wolf, who is a hunter and a scavenger. Although it may seem gross, feces is a source of protein and most dogs will eat cat and/or rabbit feces if given the chance. This does not mean that your dog is getting inadequate nutrition or is deficient in some mineral, however. Keep in mind that dogs can pick up intestinal parasites from this behavior, so we recommend fecal tests once or twice a year, depending upon exposure to parasites. If your dog is eating his/her own feces, there is a remedy known as For-Bid. This is a food additive that will make the feces unappealing to your dog. This needs to be used as part of an overall training program to try to deter the behavior.   

Why is chocolate bad for dogs? 

Chocolate contains methylxanthines and phosphodiesterase inhibitors, which can cause vasoconstriction (tightening of veins), increased heart rate and central nervous system stimulation. Mild ingestion may just cause gastrointesinal upset (vomiting and diarrhea), but large quantities can lead to heart failure, weakness, seizures, coma and even death. If your pet ingests any chocolate, please call your veterinarian right away. It is very helpful to know the quantity ingested as well as the type of chocolate. It is important to note that dark and bakers chocolate have a much higher level of methyxanthines. 

Why does my dog hate to have his nails trimmed? 

If an animal is not handled regularly at a young age, he/she will develop a fear of being restrained and manipulated. Most dogs are sensitive about their feet being touched. This could be from a prior bad experience in which the nails were cut too short (which is painful) or simply from a lack of exposure to such handling. It is a good idea to touch your dog's feet often at a young age to help them get accustomed to this type of handling and reward with treats as you do this.

Dr. Michele Drake, veterinarian and owner of The Drake Center for Veterinary Care, has been treating pets in Encinitas for over 20 years. For more information on pet health or to schedule an appointment for your pet, please call The Drake Center at (760) 753-9393 or visit www.thedrakecenter.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Richard Cone November 14, 2012 at 12:30 pm
AS always, the Drake Center has good advice on your dog. When our Yorkie was with us, we went to Drake Center for her care and the staff is always attentive, caring and thorough. Don't hesitate to trust Drake with the care of your pet. You cannot find a better vet anywhere, Truly, take my word for it, these folks are the best in the business!
Regards, Richard Cone
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Mary E June 19, 2013 at 04:01 pm
do you get a donation receipt for tax purposes?
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.