.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: Pay Attention

City Council candidate Lisa Shaffer weighs in on the importance of being informed.

There have been describing in Encinitas city politics.  For me, it started when I moved to Encinitas, and realized that the scale of politics here was small enough that individuals could really make a difference.  Someone suggested I meet Teresa Barth when she was running for City Council.  I did, I was impressed, and I started paying attention.

There are many great things about Encinitas, and I want them to continue.  There are some wonderful people working for the City, and I want them and the new City Manager to be successful.  However, the current direction of the City Council majority is worrisome, and their lack of open, honest dialog about key issues makes me wonder if we really know the whole story – are we really as fiscally healthy as they claim?  What about the underfunding of the Hall property park?  What about unfunded road maintenance needs?  What about the extremely generous pensions that continue to be offered to new employees?

I have seen some decisions that cause great concern, and behavior that is unbecoming a fine city like Encinitas.  Some examples:

  • Lack of transparency:  The Council majority chose to go to court rather than release a draft report on road conditions, and then to appeal the ruling when the court said the city had no compelling reason to withhold the report.  In just this one case, the City spent $35,000 on extra fees for the City Attorney, whose job and pay seem unrelated to his performance in protecting the City from lawsuits and/or winning those that are valid.
  • Cronyism:  I have heard Council members say that their goal is to have people who are like-minded on our public commissions.  I think the goal should be to have intelligent, committed people with expertise and a range of views, who will try to balance the diversity of interests and opinions that reflect the diversity of our community.  If you only appoint your friends to key positions, you’ll get cooperation and efficiency, but to what end?  Whose interests are being served efficiently?  My priority is a Council and commissions that are representative of the community.
  • Lapses of ethics:  Among the recent examples of conduct unbecoming a Council, the Council majority on Nov. 2 dismissed the serious allegations that Mr. Muir used City email during his official work hours to engage in campaign activities in violation of the City’s ethics code.  A few weeks earlier, Mr. Stocks voted on the expenditure of city funds to install an electric vehicle charging station that would provide free power that he would personally benefit from, as the owner of an electric car.  While the decision to put in an EV charging station is great, Stocks should have recused himself.  Instead, Mayor Bond joked about it as being Jerome’s personal charging station, while the City Attorney looked on silently. Ethics are not a joke.

The list above just gives a few examples of behavior by the City Council majority and the City Attorney that have motivated me to get involved, get informed, bear witness, and ultimately to enter the race to win a seat on the Council.  While I don’t claim to have all the answers, I do have a deep and abiding commitment to honest, open dialog, and to treating everyone with respect.  I think Encinitas can do better and I know Encinitas deserves better. Seniors, youth, skaters, animal lovers, families, and anyone else who feels unheard – I urge you to get involved. Occupy the voting booth. Volunteer in a campaign.  Talk to your friends and neighbors. If you aren’t upset about what’s going on in Encinitas, you haven’t been paying attention!

This Letter to the Editor was written by 2012 City Council candidate Lisa Shaffer. 

If you have a Letter to the Editor that you would like to submit, please email it toMarlena.Medford@Patch.com.

Like this article? Like us on Facebook, too. Or follow us on Twitter. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Bruce Stephens November 5, 2011 at 11:47 am
Well said, Ms Shaffer. Let's hope the people of Encinitas hear your call to get involved. It is time for a new direction on the city council.
Deborrah Henry, M.A. November 5, 2011 at 01:28 pm
Ms Shaffer,
Cuddos to you for standing up. I agree with you just from my small and innocent questioning. I wrote a note to the Mayor (may as well start at the top) about the lack of a movie theatre in the area. To me, that's ridiculous to not have a theatre close by for our families. I didn't realize that the Wal-Mart controversy was going on at the same time...and did receive an e-mail back from the Mayor saying he didn't think a theatre was interested in opening in Encinitas. I e-mailed Marlena (editor of the Patch) to ask about any information regarding a theatre for Encinitas. She sent me back information in the form of the Wal-Mart reporting, about Ultra Star saying they'd love to have available to them the Home Expo building for a theatre. I sent that quote to the Mayor and his was response was..."thanks for sharing". In e-mail language I think he told me to ............ well, probably nothing I'd consider. I'm open for honest, responsible and accountable leadership.
Marlena Medford (Editor) November 5, 2011 at 01:51 pm
Here's a link to the story Deborrah is referring to, which includes an interview with UltraStar's CEO:
http://encinitas.patch.com/articles/is-walmart-opening-in-encinitas
Chris may November 5, 2011 at 04:12 pm
I am and have been extremely distressed for the last 10 years at the strangle hold that the council majority has had on out city. They have publicly stated that they will not listen to 'activist' or 'dissidents'. These terms mean, to them, anyone who does not agree with them. They have used their powers to control the council agenda, ignore public opinion, disreguard planning commission recomendations, appoint political comrades to commission posts in disreguard to what is best for the city, dismissed commission chairs and members because they offer their expert opinions that do not agree with them, talked down to citizens who offer valid opinions they do not share, told lies to the press, hindered open government and dialogue, held completed public documents from public view for political reasons and have flaunted their power with arrogance and distain for any citizen that does not agree with them.
They will "DO WHAT THEY WANT", as a majority council member callously announced during one of the many occasions that the citizen majority disagreed with the council majority. And yes there is nothing we can do until elections next year. Their latest action to prove their contempt for the majority of voting citizens further show they are in control and don't care what anyone thinks. Embarrassing.
Mike Andreen November 5, 2011 at 04:28 pm
If there is something everyone seems to agree with; its the fact that most people living in Encinitas would love to have a movie theater back within the City limits.
While the CEO of Ultra Star has expressed the wish to locate a theater in Encinitas, the fact is, at the present time, per-square-foot leasing rates for commercial space along El Camino Real being around $3.00, Ultra Star won't locate a theater here that will not be profitable and both the City and Ultra Star have done the math and at this juncture it does not make economic sense to open a new theater here; as much as we all would like one. Perhaps some time in the future? In fact, it is Deputy Mayor Jerome Stocks, himself, on his own personal time, whom has pursued a variety of entertainment companies in an attempt to bring a theater chain here to our home town; while he was not successful he gets an 'A' for effort; and as to the ability to bring a public electric car charging station; certainly no one would be allowed to get free electricity from such a municipal access; that is just nonsense and anyone viewing council comments about the possibility knows that. Announced candidates for public office, when accusing other public officials/potential opponents of political misconduct might be well-served to consider actual facts, not just public sentiment; before making unfounded accusations. Certainly they would like to be treated in the same manner; don't you think?
encinitasyouneedus November 5, 2011 at 04:41 pm
In response to Chris May: There is absolutely something we can do right now. We have a hand full of weeks to rouse our friends and neighbors to protest our Mayor in Exile Teresa Barth. The Mayor position in Encinitas is a powerfully important position, despite the ton of lies, myths and misinformation Stocks, Bond, Gaspar claim. The Mayor has tremendous control over the agenda, assigning board positions, regular meeting with council commissions, other city mayors, regional and state organizations. The City Manager and staff work closely with the mayor.
Teresa Barth has been passed over repeatedly. We've had enough. Write a letter to Patch and the other papers. View the video clips of last tear;s mayor appointment. http://www.youtube.com/user/encinitasyouneedus?feature=mhum#p/u/41/TpnJDtyYU9E Mark your calendar for Tuesday, December 2011. There are only 2 meetings before this one, November 9th and November 16th. This is the most important thing we can do RIGHT NOW to Occupy City Council. Again, talk to people face-to-face or Facebook. Email the Mayor, Deputy Mayor to demand Barth as mayor - often. Write letters to all of the papers. Don't ever count the people out. Screw us - We reproduce.
Lisa Shaffer November 5, 2011 at 04:45 pm
Indeed, Mike, we should all speak based on facts. I just reviewed the video from the Oct. 12 City Council meeting. This agenda item begins at 46:55 minutes into the meeting, where Mayor Bond refers to the agenda item as Jerome Stocks' charging station. At 1:04:20, Kristin asks Jerome how much it costs and Jerome says it's free. So maybe you think free charging is nonsense, but that is what is on the public record as the plan for this pilot project. Check the facts yourself!
encinitasyouneedus November 5, 2011 at 04:45 pm
Apologies for error (year's not tear;s) and leaving out the date - December 13, 2011 - Tuesday Special Council Meeting to appoint 2012 Mayor.
If this gang of four cronies isn't tyranny enough, Stocks as Mayor during an election year is a horror Encinitas citizens should not have to suffer.
Lisa Shaffer November 5, 2011 at 05:03 pm
PS: I serve on the Board of the California Center for Sustainable Energy, which is the organization that deserves credit for bringing the EV charging stations program to the region, including Encinitas. And I applaud Mr. Stocks for supporting the idea. I just think a conflict of interest is not something to be taken lightly, and he should have recused himself from that vote. If he didn't recognize the problem, the Mayor or the City Attorney should have, since everyone made reference to the fact that he has an electric vehicle.
Ecomim November 5, 2011 at 05:33 pm
With all due respect, in case this is not common knowledge, the CEO of Ultra Star was aware of the rental price tag on the 25 year lease of the empty Home Expo building when he publically announced his interest in renting that space. The company had also previously expressed the desire to open a state of the art movie theater in that location to both the city planning department and the real estate department of The Home Depot.
Anjani November 5, 2011 at 08:24 pm
Cronyism and political prostitution make me want to take a xanax but I hate big pharma so I won't. The debuty mayor Jerome Stocks can have his electirc Caddy but he will not get re-elected because I'm channeling Joan of Arc. After the city council meeting I introduced myself and told him I wanted to apply for the planning commission job. He basically told me in a round about way that I wasn't smart enough or qualified. Now that's not how a public servant should treat the people. They should be encouraging, not discouraging. I'll tell you this. I'm honest and transparent and I know better than to put a Wal-Mart in the proposed longitude and latitude. Not to mention suspect heresay criminal activity, which I have good reason to believe is true because I was there and I saw his body language. The city council is going down and I can't wait. It's the New Aeon now. Good things to come. Vote for me Anjani.
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/104412/wall-mart-implodes
Anjani November 5, 2011 at 09:47 pm
Wait, wait, I can wait because I'm learning how to "Be here now." One of my yoga teachers said to me once, "the present moment is a gift, that's why it's called the "present" Zing!
Deborrah Henry, M.A. November 20, 2011 at 03:53 pm
In my dealings with Teresa Barth, she has been honest, forthcoming and supportive. Is she seriously considering running for Mayor...? Here here Teresa!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
gay_wayland June 16, 2013 at 06:20 am
when and where is the sale? Where should donations be taken?
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.