.
Feedback

New Pediatrician's Group in Del Mar: Smaller, Slower, Better

For Coast Pediatrics, a new group in Del Mar, a smaller practice with more time for appointments makes the difference.

When I first had my eldest child, now 6, I researched local pediatricians in coastal North County, where we live, and found that everyone went to one of two groups. Those I asked were neither overjoyed, nor disappointed by either one. We’ve switched around a bit, but all in all, both practices function in much the same way: you have a primary doctor, but any one of over ten physicians are available to see your child if they’re sick and need an appointment that day. 

I, like the others, was not overly thrilled with either practice. They seemed to serve our purposes just fine, although I was never happy about the impersonal size and rushed feel. However when my second daughter was born two years ago, we switched to our current doctor, Dr. Shakha Gillin, and really formed a bond with her. Dr. Gillin seemed very smart, caring and efficient. She clearly adored my kids and treated cautiously but with extreme thoroughness. She was also very thoughtful and open to preferences we had which may have differed from others, like requesting an alternative vaccine schedule.

That’s why I was so saddened when I went to set up an appointment with her a couple of months ago only to find she’d left the practice. Luckily, our Dr. Gillin quickly resurfaced with a surprise new practice she’d started with two other pediatricians in Del Mar called Coast Pediatrics. When we went to see her there the other day for the first time, we were very happy with what we found. The beautiful office seemed friendly and well-run, right down to a patient portal website where families can do surveys, see their charts (including growth charts), and even request refills from home. The one visit we had at Coast was already less rushed than any we've had before and I’m sure their new vision is the reason why.

The new practice is located off Carmel Valley Road and Interstate-5 and includes only three physicians: Doctors Gillin, Taylor and Warner. Their concept is for a smaller and slower practice than what many of us are used to. I, for one, am really excited to have an opportunity to be treated by such a small group of doctors, each of whom will have opportunities get to know my kids well over the coming years. 

Recently I sat down with Dr. Gillin to ask her a few questions about her big move and the ways in which this new, much smaller practice would work. Here’s what she said:

Why did you want to start the practice?

It was sort of a dream. I wanted to start my dream practice. I was lucky enough to have two amazing, caring, and smart  partners who had similar dreams. I worked in Encinitas with amazing physicians and staff, but the medical system has forced us to see patients quicker than we would like. I wanted to open a practice that allowed me to have just a little bit more time with each patient, a little bit more personal care. 

Was it a long time in the making? Hard to do?

It was, and is, hard to do, but not in the practice of medicine. The hard part is in the area of business. Working with insurances, IT, that sort of thing. But there is nothing as rewarding as seeing our patients and families—that is the best part of it all!

What makes your practice unique?

Our goal is to be an old school, small practice. We are scheduling our appointment times for a little but longer than usual, and limiting the total number of patients we will have in the practice. This way, we know every patient and family that is a part of our practice.

What kinds of things do you want perspective families to know about your practice most of all?

I truly think we are fortunate in San Diego to have so many excellent physicians. What makes us different is that we are committed to being small, and knowing your child and your family. 

You can get in touch with Coast Pediatrics by visiting their website or calling the office at (858) 794-7337.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.