.
Feedback

Teenage Boy Airlifted to Palomar Medical Center After Encinitas Crash

Investigators think speed is a factor in single-vehicle collision about 5:20 p.m. on Westlake Street.

A 17-year-old boy was injured Thursday afternoon after crashed a car he was driving in the 500 block of Westlake Street in Encinitas, according to sheriff’s Deputy Anthony O’Boyle.

His condition was not released.

The boy lost control of the vehicle as he was going south on Westlake Street, just north of Requeza Street, and struck a parked flatbed tow truck, O’Boyle said.

Encinitas firefighters responded to the call about 5:20 p.m. and extracted the teen, who was airlifted to Palomar Medical Center.

Investigators think speed was a factor, but are not sure if drugs or alcohol were involved, O’Boyle said.

Anyone with information about this case is asked to call the Sheriff's Department nonemergency line at 858-565-5200, he stated.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter

Mk March 15, 2013 at 09:54 pm
It is STILL there...just saw it on my way home
laurie michaels March 15, 2013 at 10:07 pm
If everyone of us call or e-mail our city council members and Rob Blough head of traffic in Encinitas, that should get their attention. They don't need to see this thread they need to hear from us!!!
kathryn harris March 16, 2013 at 12:32 am
Thank you for getting back to me, yes Michael and his family are in our prayers! We are all in this crazy life together and I really hope that he has a full recovery!
Abbi Lawrance March 16, 2013 at 02:04 pm
I have just contacted some city officials asking that something be done. Michael, you hang in there - you are in lots of people's prayers.
Abbi Lawrance March 16, 2013 at 02:46 pm
I just got this back from our mayor:
"We will ask the city staff to investigate and see what can be done. I don't know, without further research, what is legal or not. If the truck was legally parked, we should re-examine our rules to see if we should make it illegal. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lisa Shaffer Deputy Mayor City of Encinitas"
katmaus March 16, 2013 at 08:16 pm
My kids entire school has him in our prayers. The little bit about this boy in the hospital that we heard was that he is critical. Nearly every organ was damaged. Punctured lung, internal bleeding, new driver on the way to lacrosse game for the school. Very sad!! But he is still here and fighting. They should impound the stupid truck. Don't they clear cars after a wreak normally? After a police report? Is it allowed to park for weeks and months on a public street in the same spot, never moving it? Really? At least contact this guy and ask him to move it out of common curtousy.
Encinitas local March 17, 2013 at 12:52 am
I am sorry for the kid getting injured, but do you all realize that any vehicle parked there would have been hit. You are all putting this blame on this truck. The kid was driving like an idiot. Approximate speed was double the speed limit. who are you gonna blame if he hits a mother and her children walking on that same side walk. also, the kids car could've went over the side into the resident driveway. it's not the best place for the truck, but if you drive the posted 25mph there won't be an issue and don't over exagerate, I also drive a big work truck by that tow truck and never have an issue. the kid did a stupid thing and he is paying the price. thankfully he will live, but don't put the blame on the parked vehicle, blame the kid.
Family March 17, 2013 at 02:49 am
We don't know if he will live. He lost control trying to avoid the truck. He's not an idiot. This is not the first crash involving this tow truck. But thanks for your sympathy and concern, Local.
Family member
RATSJ March 17, 2013 at 03:03 am
I am not certain, but I believe it is illegal to have any vehicle parked on a city street in the same spot for more than 72 hours. If it is, it can be legally towed. I think the sheriff's department gives you fair warning before this happens by leaving a notice on your windshield.
Lee March 17, 2013 at 03:51 am
To the "Encinitas local"... The problem with the flat bed tow truck is that it acted like a guillotin..he went right into it.. Had it been a regular car or Suv Michael's injuries would not have been so great. I understand he was speeding , but have a little compassion. You must have never been a young kid who drove too fast a time or two. Maybe it's your tow truck?
Encinitas local March 17, 2013 at 04:37 am
He did not crash avoiding the truck!!! That is where you are mistaken. look at the skid marks. He lost control going around a curve at a great rate of speed, period and ended up hitting a parked vehicle. so don't take your anger out on the wrong person.
Encinitas local March 17, 2013 at 04:54 am
I have tons of compassion and I am very bummed to hear someone (a kid) got injured as I have a kid (girl) that just started driving which scares me more now. Not my truck, but am aware of who the owner is. Also, I am still a daredevil behind the wheel. The kid straight up is to blame for his actions. The end result is he is hurt. You can't honestly tell me with facts that if there was another vehicle there or no vehicle the outcome couldn't have been worse. You can say it, but you cannot prove it. I will say Mr. Lee. I don't think he should park there either, But that truck is not to blame for this unfortunate situation. fingers need to be pointed at one person and I hope that one person gets better soon.
Lee March 17, 2013 at 12:17 pm
I actually do know for a fact as i work in the emergency field and spoke to the rescuers about this situation. Yes it is the boys fault for speeding but had it been any other vehicle the results would have been different. Since u r friends of the owner of the vehicle i suggest u stop leaving your biased and hurtful opinion as it makes the rest of us Encinitas Locals look like inconsiderate @&$@@'%#^*.
kathryn harris March 17, 2013 at 04:09 pm
Just PRAY for him and his family!
kathryn harris March 17, 2013 at 10:44 pm
Do any of you have news on Michaels condition! Thank you..
AM March 18, 2013 at 12:18 am
Praying for Michael. I came upon the accident before emergency workers were there. I drive Westlake several times per day and have always felt that truck should NEVER be parked on a curved street. It was a tragic accident waiting to happen. Clearly driving into a flat bed is completely different from hitting a parked car. I will voice my concern with the mayor's office. I wish I has done it before.
Debi March 18, 2013 at 12:36 am
Let's say the truck wasn't there and instead he ended up going down the embankment into someone's house. What if the truck wasn't there and he hit someone on the sidewalk instead...I saw the sheriffs department measuring the Skidmarks this morning. I am sorry this young man is in the hospital but the accident is not the trucks fault.
Joe March March 18, 2013 at 02:51 am
OKAY - all of you guys must have seen it happen or work for the police department/hospital because you obviously know exactly what's going on, right?? do you think any of his family members are reading all of your hurtful statements right now? I'm sure that makes them feel good! Wonder how you'd feel if that happened to one of your loved ones.... how spiteful to infer that he somehow deserves whatever happened.
RATSJ March 18, 2013 at 02:58 am
It is very sad to read some of these heartless posts. Please, people, have a little bit of decency and compassion for a fellow human being. Wouldn't you want that for yourself?
Joe March March 18, 2013 at 03:10 am
Debi - if the truck wasn't there, he wouldn't have had to avoid it.... you seem like you have nothing to contribute but hateful comments... why bother?
Joe March March 18, 2013 at 03:13 am
Try to go as fast as you can on that road. How fast can you get up to? Do you think you can even get to double the speed? Secondly, how do you know he will live?? And you're on here making these totally insensitive comments. How can you call someone's kid an idiot? What if your daughter was in a similar situation, or in the car with someone who was driving and this happened to them?
Joe March March 18, 2013 at 04:02 am
At first I couldn't believe a couple people on here, but then I realized that bullies thrive on negative attention and when we reply to their garbage, they thrive on it. Guess it's better to ignore in the end. If that's the kind of person they are, who cares what they say.
MK March 18, 2013 at 02:51 pm
As a parent of a 17 year old boy that goes to the same school as Michael, my heart goes out to Michael and his family. As parents, we are all in this together and it could have been any one of us going through this right now. That is what happens when there are ACCIDENTS.....this forum should not be used to discuss or place blame..but to get the word out to pray for this boy and his family.
kathryn harris March 19, 2013 at 05:41 pm
Do any of you know how Michael is doing? I agree the most important thing is that the prayers keep coming!
Lucas Collier March 19, 2013 at 05:58 pm
I am a family member of Michaels and I'm not blaming any one. We as adults we are here to help guide and midi-gate dangers from our kids. We cant predict everything, but as the owner of the truck he had to have known that parking where he was, and on a route going to a school where young drivers drive to was a bad idea. It was a tow truck for crying out load. We cant change what happened last week but we can change is going to happen tomorrow. As far as putting all the blame on a kid, ask your self what u would have done different your self. Move the truck, problem solved.
kathryn harris March 19, 2013 at 06:46 pm
Lucas, how is Michael ? Too much about the truck on this thread! Hopefully with respect to the situation it will be moved permanently but my concern is Michaels condition, can you or someone shed some light ! I hope is getting better and stronger !!
Daniel Woolfolk (Editor) March 20, 2013 at 04:52 pm
Hi Lucas,
I hope he is doing better. A lot of readers are asking for updates on Michael. Is that something you can provide? If not, I completely understand. Thank you, Daniel
Josephine March 21, 2013 at 02:59 am
Daniel - his family would appreciate it if you would remove the hateful comments from Debi and Encinitas Local who seem to have nothing to contribute. I think his family would feel like the people who truly care for his well-being are aware of his condition and don't need more info out for people to shamelessly gossip about. For those who are concerned, prayers are still appreciated.
Daniel Woolfolk (Editor) March 21, 2013 at 03:07 am
Hi Josephine,
Thank you, I will let those asking know that there won't be a public update. I have reviewed the comments on this thread and they do not violate the terms of use.
Daniel Woolfolk (Editor) March 21, 2013 at 03:47 am
And I should add that, while the comments don't violate our terms of use, I can see them heading that way and will close this comments section.
I will also be away from my computer until Tuesday. If anyone has any questions, please email Hoa Quach at hoa.quach@patch.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.