Op-Ed: Let Encinitas Voters Decide What Sort of Development We Can Live With

A new community group is pushing for a ballot initiative that would let voters have a say when it comes to major development projects that impact quality of life.

Dear Editor, 

For most participants, the process of updating the of the Encinitas General Plan has been frustrating and difficult. These elements must be resolved before the City Council can consider the overall General Plan Update. To engage the public in re-drafting the housing element, the city administered that pitted the five Encinitas communities against each other. We have yet to see the results of that exercise. 

Consequently, the General Plan Update is stalled after two years of work, and there’s still no red-line version of the current general plan. These circumstances should produce local political drama in the run-up to the November election.

Some residents who were concerned with the potential outcome of the dot-mapping exercise have formed a committee called the Encinitas Project. The committee’s goal is simple: a ballot initiative that would let registered voters in Encinitas decide on major density increases in the city. 

At issue are up-zoning decisions meant to increase the density set by the present General Plan. A four of five member majority of the Encinitas City Council is required to approve certain up-zoning in the five communities—New Encinitas, Old Encinitas, Cardiff, Leucadia, Olivenhain—that make up the city.

Because the General Plan Update won’t go before the current Council before November’s election, the next City Council will eventually vote on it, should the present procedure remain in place. However, if the Encinitas Right-to-Vote Initiative reaches the ballot and voters approve it, residents will decide if major density increases should be allowed in the city.

With the Encinitas Right-to-Vote Initiative in place, voters would have the opportunity to decide if proposed changes respect community character, and maintain or improve their quality of life. Poorly planned projects that would increase traffic and the carbon footprint, degrade infrastructure, force density or height changes, or just fit badly with our community character would have little chance of approval. 

The initiative is not no-growth, but it would mean growth most people can abide. The City of Escondido adopted a similar initiative, and that community has since approved two development projects because voters felt they were a good fit.

The Encinitas Right-to-Vote Initiative would take the trickery out of land speculation. Developers would have to work within current zoning. Pushing city council members to up-zone would stop. Similarly, city planners would have to submit proposed up-zoning to a vote of the people. The initiative would subject the General Plan Update to a voters’ referendum.

The Encinitas Right-to-Vote Initiative would govern major housing and land-use amendments. The initiative defines a major amendment as any that: 

• Increases the number of permitted dwelling units on a residential lot

• Increases the number of separate parcels that might be created from an existing parcel 

• Changes zone type for a parcel from Agricultural, Public/Semi-Public, Ecological Resource/Open Space/Parks or Open Space to a different zone type

• Changes zone type for a parcel from a non-mixed-use zone to a mixed-use zone

• Changes a parcel from any residential land use to any non-residential land use

• Increases the allowed maximum height of development or how height is measured

• Increases the maximum allowable commercial or retail square footage for a parcel

• Repeals any planning-policy document

Most Encinitas residents want to maintain our small beach-town atmosphere. We’re concerned about environmental issues, traffic, adequate resources, proper infrastructure and overall quality of life. We love our town and want to continue loving it. As Encinitas approaches built-out status, growth can only go two ways: denser and taller. A look at community history reveals that local control of growth motivated Encinitas to incorporate as a city in 1986. Passing the Encinitas Right-to-Vote Initiative is in keeping with that precedent.

Volunteers are starting to walk neighborhoods to gather the number of signatures needed to get the initiative on a future ballot. Volunteers will also be in front of stores with forms for registered voters to sign. You can also find out more about the initiative by visiting the committee’s website at http://www.EncinitasRightToVote.com.

The Encinitas Project Committee is encouraged by the very positive response it’s received so far. The committee’s website will soon list dates and locations where registered voters can sign the ballot initiative petition. 

Thank You,

Encinitas Project

Editor’s Note: You can also follow the group on Twitter at @EncinitasRTV.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter

change4encinitas July 29, 2012 at 02:18 AM
Well said Cyrus!
Denise Martin July 29, 2012 at 02:22 AM
The initiative is not a "no growth" initiative. It just allows the residents to weigh-in on zoning changes. All we have ever had is a self-certified housing element, and we haven't been in compliance for the last two housing cycles. The same with many other cities. This seems to be the standard more than not. The residents of Encinitas should be in control of their city's destiny. It is crazy to leave control in the hands of a few council members who, as Cyrus Kamada says, are given large sums of money and support for their campaigns from developers. If the city had our best interests at heart, then they would challenge the laws and the incorrect population growth numbers that are being shoved down our throats.
Jay Berman July 29, 2012 at 02:22 AM
The state law SB375 wants 30 housing units per acre ... we will have to tell the state to screw off or look for high rises on El Camino Real
Denise Martin July 29, 2012 at 02:29 AM
And guess what? The ERAC committee (comprised of several hand-chosen developers) and facilitated by Peder Norby is now talking about 30+ units per acre. This is code for 45 or more units per acre.
Jay Berman July 29, 2012 at 02:33 AM
Right out of ICELI playbook ... soon, the state will make it impossible to build single family houses. Everything they are doing is based on AB32 and SB375 - they impliment UN Agenda 21 through every city and county in the state as well as organizations like SANDAG .. kill highway programs, jam up traffic corridors with "smart growth" projects and build ultra high density on transit corridors .. all of which will destroy our quality of life for nothing ...


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something