.
Feedback

Bringing Home Baby: Is It Supposed to Be This Tough?

To those who don't want to share with pregnant couples how hard those first few months may be, I say,“Scare 'em!” They may thank you for it later.

To those new parents out there I want to say the following:

  • This may be really hard right now; it gets better.
  • Babies cry; some babies cry a lot. Again, it gets better.
  • Don't worry if you don't feel the "baby bliss" or instant bonding you may have heard about; you will.
  • Breast-feeding can be especially tricky for some and if you work at it with the help of a lactation consultant or support group, it will soon be effortless and good.
  • About 80 percent of U.S. women get “baby blues” in the days after giving birth and roughly 15 percent of women get postpartum depression, with which your doctor may be able to help.
  • Did I mention it gets better?

My neighbor, we’ll call her Lena, just had a baby. When I ask her mother-in-law how it’s going, she says “He sure does cry a lot.” Uh-oh.

When I speak with Lena, I tell her how many babies I’ve seen among my friends and family members who scream as much as hers does. She is very relieved. “I thought there was really something wrong with me,” she says. “I mean, how come I see so many women out with their babies and they look so happy—the baby doesn’t even cry?”

“It runs the gamut,” I tell her. “Remember, you only see the mamas of the easier babies out and about. The rest of them are home still in their pajamas, trying to figure out what the heck just hit them.” This seems to soothe her, but as the weeks wear on and I still hear her little one screaming on a walk every night, I know not much I can say will really help—she and her husband just have to get through it, and they will.

On TV, new babies coo and wave their fists about while their parents show them off proudly. After that, they generally nap in sweetly trimmed bassinets while the action of life takes place around them. I can only assume this is because no one finds much interest in watching the true, exhausting, daily trials of bringing home an infant. Mostly, no one wants to hear all that screaming.

Babies cry, it’s what they do. It’s all they have, at first, to tell us what’s up. But some babies cry more than others and some newborns really seem to almost never stop screaming. At least their parents don’t have to worry about strong lungs.

But this isn't what we see in our sanitized modern world. When we see babies, they are usually gurgly and calm. If not, they're quickly being ushered out of shared public spaces to a place where only their caregiver and a select few others can see what it takes to soothe them.

Contrast this with the communal life of the village that our ancestors once knew. This was a place where human functions were shared on a such a close level that it would be hard to imagine in our society today.

Babies were born in front of a community of women who either knew or would need to know all about this process. Breasts of new mothers were constantly exposed because that’s what it took to keep a new baby fed and happy. The exhaustion and distress of becoming a new parent was seen, or at least heard, by all of the extended family and neighbors. There were few who didn’t know to expect some of this when their time came.

We could use a little bit of this visibility today. Then I might not be hearing things from women like, “No one breast-feeds anymore,” (actually 80 percent of U.S. moms do), or, “Why didn’t someone tell me those first few months would be so hard?”

“We didn’t want to scare you,” a well-meaning friend might say. I say, “Scare ’em!” They may thank you for it later.

There is so much preparation in our culture for the parts of new parenthood that are short-lived or barely matter—room décor and layette clothing, for example. Even preparing for a birth, an important influence on your labor outcome, is not as essential as preparing people for what comes next.

Support for women postpartum is just so important and so hard to achieve these days. Everything about having a baby lends itself to isolation: the recovery process, the all-consuming new tasks, and how hard and often ill-advised it is to go out too much with a new baby.

As much as we may want to leave new families alone in peace to bond and recover, I wish there were more ways to let them know they're not alone. Too, if we made the issues surrounding new parenthood more visible, educated each other about what's really normal, it would go a long way for those who feel there’s something wrong with them if they have a hard time or don't bond right away.

In some ways, the notion that things will improve just seems like words. But I know from personal experience and from talking with friends, if we'd known all this beforehand, we may have handled it all with a bit less desperation.

I don’t see us going back to the village way of life anytime soon, though. So it’s up to each of us to spread the word: Life and birth are messy. The good news is, we get through it—we are stronger than we think.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Megan Pincus Kajitani August 16, 2011 at 03:51 pm
Thanks, Abi, sending this to my brother- and sister-in-law, about to have their first baby! :)
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Mary E June 19, 2013 at 04:01 pm
do you get a donation receipt for tax purposes?
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.