.
Feedback

Snooping—Reprehensible or Responsible Parenting?

Is it OK for parents to pry?

As parents, we all want to know what our kids are up to—but getting the information we need isn’t always easy.

This week, our local Moms Council discusses the issue of privacy.

Do you snoop through your kids’ stuff? Is it prying to read your child’s diary, monitor their online habits and listen to their conversations—or is it just responsible parenting? Is snooping wrong—or necessary?

Stacey Ross: Good question! To what degree do our kids deserve privacy since they are our dependents, after all? I think if we suspect something or are looking out for their wellbeing, our snooping is not only warranted, but responsible parenting. Their rights are trumped by our obligations to see that their activities or possessions are things we approve of. 

If we are, for example, reading our child’s diary, checking his/her backpack for notes or drugs, looking over emails—and we have a strong motivation to do so—again, good parenting! I would go to the lengths of testing urine! The way I look at it, as long as our kids are in our house and not supporting themselves, their personal privileges only go so far. They are our responsibility .

Carol Yeh-Garner: My kids are almost 8 years old and 5 years old. I already “snoop” in a way by listening in on their conversations when they have friends over to hear what they are talking about. When our kids have cell phones, we plan to have a rule that parents can look at texts and emails whenever we want. I'm not sure I'll be going through their rooms item by item, but I'll definitely be peeking here and there.

I think that it is a necessary thing because it's important that parents know what their children are talking about, what their friends are saying to them and what influences they are being exposed to.

Judy Halter: Children in the teen years who are not big communicators may benefit from a parent checking out diaries or text messages. These are tricky times and if the communication isn’t strong, it may be the only way for a parent to see if there are any issues.  

I wouldn't recommend making a habit of this, but if a parent feels something is out of sync and is having a hard time finding out why, it might be helpful to check Facebook, texts or a diary. Sometimes teens put the information there for you to find it.

Jennifer Zeglen: I think snooping is absolutely necessary. First and foremost, it's important to set up a good relationship with your kids with open lines of communication. But that doesn't always work out the way we like to think it does. Snooping is a good way to try to confirm that what your kids are telling you is the truth and to spot problems before they become huge. I don't think parents should necessarily confront their kids about what they find—it’s just another source of information to try to keep tabs on their social, emotional, and physical health.

Genevieve Suzuki: Quinn is still too young for me to worry about violating her privacy. That said, I'll totally keep on top of her when she gets older. At the very least, I’ll have open access to her bedroom and to her laptop. If she has a Facebook or MySpace account, I’ll share access with her. There are too many dangers out there facing children to leave it to our kids to make certain decisions on their own. It’s not even that I wouldn’t trust my daughter – it’s more that I don’t trust the rest of the world.

The one thing I’d likely leave alone is an old-fashioned diary. There, she could keep private thoughts completely private, away from the public’s and my prying eyes. (Okay, unless I had probable cause to check on any suspicious behavior. If it’s good enough for the cops, it’s good enough for me!)

Ray Pearson: My three kids have each been treated with mutual respect as long as they have respect for the family. In their teens, privacy was always important to them. That was upheld until it warranted some snooping. Examples of snooping included when homework, medicine, glasses and parent request forms were missing, I would check their backpacks or rooms.

Meet our moms (and dad):

Genevieve Suzuki has one 2-year-old daughter. In addition to having her own law practice, she writes feature stories for Encinitas Patch. She is also the author of "The Original Poi Cats on O'ahu," a children's book published in Hawaii.

Carol Yeh-Garner is the mom of a 7-year-old boy and a 5-year-old girl who are constantly teaching her how to be a better person. She is also a local HypnoBirthing instructor and HypnoFertility practitioner.

Jennifer Zeglen is a mom to two imaginative girls, ages 4 and 6.  She is also a local naturopathic doctor with a family medicine practice.

Ray Pearson is the father of three children, ages 26, 23 and 17. He lives with his wife in Carlsbad and devotes most of his nonwork time to young people and the Rotary Club.

Stacey Ross has one 7-year-old boy and 8-year-old-daughter who remind her daily how precious life is. In addition to running two websites, she writes feature stories for the Carlsbad Patch as well as shares local and national deals for the "Frugal Family" column. 

Judy Adams Halter and Edie High Sanchez are certified Redirecting Children’s Behavior (RCB) instructors with a combined 50 years of parenting experience. Halter is the mother of four children, ages 21, 19, 17 and 14. Sanchez has two grown daughters and three grandchildren; two girls, ages 1 and 5, and a boy, age 7. Both women live in La Jolla.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Susanne May 26, 2011 at 12:54 am
Kids have so much more freedom now and it seems like the ones that get in the most trouble are the ones whose parents don't know what their kids are out there doing. Sometimes investigating is the only way parents can keep tabs.
S'hauni Waterdragon May 26, 2011 at 02:39 pm
This is a very difficult issue for me because my Mother snooped on me when I was a child. That was fifty years ago and to this day I still resent it. She would listen outside my bedroom door to my phone calls and dig through my desk drawers when I wasn't home. It was problematic for me because she would not always understand what she heard, or found. One time I was put on restriction because I used the word "bitchen" in a phone conversation with my friend and she thought the word was "bitch". She had no idea of the slang popular at the time and would not accept my explanation.
It is true that in this day and age young children are influenced by much more negative and dangerous information than we were many years ago. They also have much easier access to troublesome products and experiences than we did then, although we certainly managed to get into our share of trouble at the time. ;)
S'hauni Waterdragon May 26, 2011 at 02:39 pm
My daughter was growing up twenty years ago and because of my own experience I never snooped on her. It was my philosophy to set an example as a method of teaching. I was respectful of her privacy and taught her to be respectful in return. Saying one thing and doing another is just a real problem when raising children. They catch you right away and then they don't trust you. Always be honest with your children. I agree with the poster above who remarks that the kids who get in the most trouble are the ones whose parents don't know what their kids are doing. That is absolutely true. It is critical to communicate with your children and know what they are up to, who they hang out with, etc.
Snooping is such a distasteful and disrespectful act, even when justified, that it's hard to defend if you get caught. You risk losing the trust and confidence of your child, and that's a big problem when you are doing your best to guide them into adulthood as decent and caring human beings.
S'hauni Waterdragon May 26, 2011 at 02:40 pm
My children are grown now and I feel much empathy for parents raising their children in these very difficult and unprecedented times. What worked for me twenty years ago may not be possible today. However, my suggestion to all young mothers is to do your best to be close to your children so that it is unnecessary to snoop through their things to find out what they are up to.
1. Talk to them, ask them how things are going and REALLY LISTEN when (and if) they respond. If they are small, get down to their level and look them right in the eye. The world looks very different from a 3' high perspective; you would be surprised how it looks to them. 2. Get to know their friends, invite them over, make your home a friendly place where children would like to be. Get to know their friend's parents as well. 3. Get to know their teachers and visit their schools. Even better if you have time to volunteer. 4. Watch television, go to the movies, listen to music with them. Know their world, play their games, be immersed in their experience. You will form a connection with them that they will automatically utilize when problems come up for them, and they will be comfortable coming to you when something isn't right for them.
S'hauni Waterdragon May 26, 2011 at 02:40 pm
I know these things take a lot of your time but you already know there is nothing more important than your commitment and responsibility to your children and family. I know things were different twenty years ago, but I was a single mother who worked full time and I still made time to make my children my first priority. It has paid off over the years and today my children are as close to me as they have always been - and enjoy sharing their lives with me. It really does work. Remember positive reinforcement always works better than negative reinforcement.
My Mother snooping through my stuff only taught me to become sneakier at hiding things from her. You don't really want to go down that path. *stepping down off my soapbox* With all that said, I wish all you beautiful Mothers the best of luck and love in raising your beautiful families and admire your willingness to discuss this difficult issue. You rock!
S'hauni Waterdragon May 26, 2011 at 02:45 pm
That appeared to sound very sexist and i apologise. Must be Mother's Day on my mind. :) I should have said, "I wish all your beautiful Mothers and Fathers the best of luck..."
Blessed be.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Rick Moore June 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
The consequences are fully articulated on DEMA's website. Prop A would be a tragic setback andRead More embarrassment for our city.
Encinitas YES on A June 17, 2013 at 01:20 pm
DEMA's website is hardly a resource for anything "articulate" on Prop A, unless you countRead More baldfaced lies as "consequences." Not only was DEMA's board not "unanimous" on the vote against A as Dody Crawford claimed (and later had to take back publicly), most downtown merchants have no clue what DEMA is saying on their behalf: the few I spoke with were horrified. Folks, read the initiative for yourselves and you'll see that only major zoning changes fall under Prop A: not the boat houses, not the La Paloma, and not the SRF (whose membership is very solidly a "Yes" on A.
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.
Robert June 3, 2013 at 04:16 pm
Thanks for tweeting this, Encinitas Patch. Exactly the kind of hard-hitting local coverage you can'tRead More get from legitimate news sources.