.
Feedback

The Mother-Guilt Series No. 1: Time Away

The first in a series about mother-guilt. Need time away from your kids? Don't we all!

This is the beginning of an ongoing series about the guilt we parents carry around with us every day. With it, I aim to expose all the shoulds and the bads wherever they may be hiding in our mama psyches and bring them into the light. Let me say right now, we don’t need them.

Mothers, you know what I mean. Fathers, many of you do, too. But since I am a mama and since feelings of guilt function in such a central way for women, I have christened this “The Mother-Guilt Series.”

Topic No. 1 in The Mother-Guilt Series is about wanting time away from your kids. We all need time for ourselves to recharge, just to be, to put ourselves back on the list, as Oprah says. But when you have younger children, time away from them, just for you, is like oxygen.

Yet time and again I hear people say, “But I’m a mother. I shouldn’t feel this way about my own kids.” As if being a mother makes you the one type of person on the planet who doesn’t need to look after themselves in this way.

I know what they mean, though. Before I had kids, when I was just a “kid-person,” I used to hear women say how much they needed their kids to have an early bedtime, or fantasized about an entire day without them, and think, “Wow, they don’t even sound like they like their kids. When I have kids, I’m never gonna feel this way.”

HAH!

I must take pity on my former self and not berate her for her naivete. There really is no good way to understand what having kids is like unless you’re in the fire yourself. How could a young me, with my workout schedule and my clean furniture and my possible road-trip plans for the weekend, have ever understood the constant nature of having children?

Especially when they’re young, once you have kids the idea of work completely changes because, in the end, it’s all work now. And so there we are, feeling guilty about needing time away, when sometimes all we want is to clean our pores, catch up on bills or take a walk alone. The younger me laughs at anyone calling a long shower leisure time.

But we absolutely have to deploy our own oxygen masks first, take care of ourselves so that we can continue to take care of everyone else. To do that, we need time away from demands and questions, safety concerns and meal prep. We need time to complete more than one thought, uninterrupted, just to make sure our brains are still working right.

This has no effect whatsoever on how much we love or are attached to our children. It has to do with the nature of work and how you need to recharge to continue being productive (and, you know, not crazy).

To the stay-at-home-moms, I say, you need this! Looking after your kids is your job. You know what happens when you overwork yourself without breaks? Job burnout, that’s what. I know you already have guilt about giving up your career, or that your family may be struggling financially. Don’t worry, we’ll attack that one later on in the series.

To the employed moms, I say, you need this! Your work schedule never ends (and in traffic on the way home doesn’t count). You need some time where you don't even have to speak or think. I know this is hard to swallow when you already have all that guilt about leaving your little ones with child care providers all day, but … see above.

So, please, tell your partner, beg the grandparents, find a way to hire a sitter and don’t feel bad about it. We all crave time away from our kids. It’s only natural and it's only right. Oh, and I know what you’re thinking now. What on earth will you do first? Exercise, errands, a nap?

I hear you, mamas. Don’t forget to breathe.

miriam piven May 17, 2011 at 11:19 pm
tony Morrison said the most important thing in her life is some space that is hers - a time or place to be you.
thanks, Abi. you know that well. mirster
Jen O May 18, 2011 at 12:38 am
A clean, well-lighted space? A yoga session without sprinting out of the final savasana to get home to the kids? A date without our 4-month-old? (that's right, Lucinda Williams...shouldn't I have all this and passionate kisses?) What about actually feeling like I am more than a mediocre teacher and mother because I do both? Ah, the mama-guilt is thick!
Abi Cotler O'Roarty May 18, 2011 at 01:51 am
Thanks Jen and Miriam. Yes, it IS thick.
I often see a clean hotel room for one. No cleaning, no list, and a very big very comfy bed!
Casey O'Roarty May 18, 2011 at 12:04 pm
Well said Abi - I feel as though that guilt is always there, small and quiet most of the time, but there. It is so liberating to remember that this is something that all mothers struggle with.
:) Love you!
Megan Pincus Kajitani June 2, 2011 at 02:04 am
Touche', Abi! And, yes, there is that final question -- when I actually get the hour and I am paralyzed about what to do with it! (Note to self: get more than an hour...) Lovely message. xo

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.