.
Feedback

Medical Examiner's Office Confirms Seau Committed Suicide

Researchers may study his brain for repetitive injury if his family consents.

Thursday the Medical Examiner’s Office confirmed that Junior Seau’s death was a suicide.

The 43-year-old NFL legend inside his Oceanside home from a gunshot wound to the chest, which the Medical Examiner determined to be self-inflicted.

Deputy Medical Examiner Dr. Craig Nelson conducted the forensic autopsy, according to a news release from the county. The autopsy included a full inspection of Seau’s body and organs—and a host of laboratory studies, including a toxicology report and a microscopic examination of organs and tissues. The results of those tests will be part of the final autopsy report.

Researchers outside of the medical examiner's office may study Seau's brain for repetitive injury if his family consents, according to the news release. The family's decision is not known at this time.

After the death certificate is completed, Seau’s body will be released to the mortuary his family selects.

More details about this case will be released in the final investigative report, which may take up to 90 days to complete.

Seau played with the Chargers for 13 years before finishing his career with the Miami Dolphins and New England Patriots. Seau is the Bolts all-time leader in tackles with 1,288. He also had 47 career sacks and 15 career interceptions for San Diego. In November 2011, he was inducted into the Chargers Hall of Fame.

Patch will keep you posted as the story develops.

Jeffrey kaufman May 3, 2012 at 09:39 pm
So sad, I feel for his family and children.they should let his family be and not pick and prod into his brain. Science can use the living and let the dead lye in peace
Sean Bevins May 3, 2012 at 10:15 pm
I heard that... I don't see the mofos starin', but I sure do feel them knives twistin' in my back{:~\
Joe Spencer May 3, 2012 at 10:21 pm
Jeffrey...Junior may have wanted them to use his brain. Former NFL player Dave Duerson committed suicide last year and also shot himself in the chest...purposely saving his brain because he wanted Boston University who is studying brain damage of NFL players to have it. They can't fully study the brain of a living person. With Dave Duerson they learned alot about the damage his brain had suffered from his playing days and why his life was rapidly going south.
Larry May 3, 2012 at 10:28 pm
The only difference here is that Duerson left a not explaining what he wanted done with his brain. Junior left no note at all.
Joe Spencer May 4, 2012 at 12:39 am
Well none that we know of. When these tragedies happen its not often that they do it through their chest...and since Duerson did the same exact thing for that purpose it makes me wonder. Even still...I would think perhaps his family would want research done to help provide an explanation and closure to this horrible tragedy.
ibbarbara May 4, 2012 at 02:19 am
A true loss for his family, friends, former teammates and the City of San Diego. R.I.P. Jr Seau!!
Jennifer Reed May 4, 2012 at 02:20 am
Despite a definitive verdict from the Medical Examiner’s office, a mourning San Diego still wants to know what killed their hometown hero. The question on everyone’s minds: Is repetitive head trauma responsible for Junior Seau’s suicide?
While there is no doubt about the suspicious link between brain injury and depression and suicide, we are doing ourselves a disservice by jumping to conclusions regarding Seau’s death. Is it possible? Absolutely. Is it tragic? Undoubtedly so. But let us remember, it doesn't take repeated concussions to feel so trapped that suicide seems like the only option. The stigma surrounding mental health will not improve if the population at large still feels you need a reason, medical or otherwise, to feel depressed. Our collective leap to claim that repetitive injury is to blame for Seau’s suicide detracts from the larger issue. It takes a heartbreaking story about mental health and turns it into sweeping coverage about the dangers of violent physical sports. Albeit somber, we have an opportunity now to truly open our eyes to the reality of suicide—and we should take it.
Joe Spencer May 4, 2012 at 02:52 am
Boston University has in fact asked to examine Junior's brain. They are the ones doing the study and who examined Dave Duerson's brain at his request when he committed suicide last year. This article explains what they are looking for and what it causes. Very sad.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/150066145.html
Libi Uremovic May 4, 2012 at 10:05 am
they're checking for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy - (CTE)
suicide amount hockey and football players is far higher than norm and many feel that depression is one of the side effects of CTE
Libi Uremovic May 4, 2012 at 10:08 am
duerson was aware of CTE because he lives in the north where hockey is prevalent....and CTE is more known....
Libi Uremovic May 4, 2012 at 10:14 am
we need to open our eyes to the reality of violent sports...
...howard cosell loved boxing ... until he realized what it did to the boxers...
Melissa Mason May 4, 2012 at 01:12 pm
@Larry: Are you a close personal or family friend to know that Mr. Seau left no wish of making this type of donation? If he was an organ donor, then he has continued to do amazing work for his community. Please note: organ donation can extend to purposes of medical science when indicated by the donor. His passing is a loss.
Joe Spencer May 4, 2012 at 01:31 pm
@libi actually Duerson's understanding of CTE goes well beyond living in the midwest.
Duerson was part of a six-man volunteer panel that considered retired players’ claims under the N.F.L.’s disability plan, in addition to the 88 Plan, a fund that has assisted more than 150 families caring for retired players with dementia since its inception in 2007. Duerson read applications, testimonies and detailed doctors’ reports for hundreds of players with multiple injuries, including those to the brain that in some cases left players requiring full-time care. He had to vote on whether these people received financial assistance. He was well versed on CTE and as his life deteriorated he understood that he was likely a victim of this disease.
Joe Spencer May 4, 2012 at 01:40 pm
VERY intersting and sad video from ESPN's Outside The Lines with former Bears Quarterback (and for one season San Diego Chargers QB) Jim McMahon discussing his own issues today with memory loss.
This interview was done just weeks before the tragic loss of Junior Seau. He addresses the Dave Duerson suicide and states that a month prior there were no obvious signs of such despair from Duerson. A shocking quote from a Bears trainer back in the 80's to the local Chicago papers said that McMahon had suffered a concussion but it was cleared up by halftime. http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/39679/otl-jim-mcmahons-memory-loss

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.