.
Feedback

Sheriff's Blotter: Golf Course Hit by Theft, Vandalism

From the desk of the Encinitas station of the San Diego County Sheriff's Department as of June 1.

  • A building was vandalized and miscellaneous items reported stolen from in the 1200 block of Quail Gardens Drive on the morning of May 24. About $740 worth of items were reported stolen and damage to the building was set at $500, according to a report at the Encinitas station of the San Diego County Sheriff's Department.  No suspect information was reported.
  • Deputies arrested a 28-year-old man on suspicion of resisting arrest and drunken driving following a traffic stop in the 700 block of Encinitas Boulevard on the evening of May 30. Joseph Kaufman was booked into the County Jail in Vista on an additional charge of violating probation.
  • A 43-year-old man was assaulted in the 700 block of Teaberry Street on the evening of May 30. The victim had a severe cut, according to the report. No suspect information was reported.
  • A 31-year-old woman was arrested after deputies answered a disturbance call in the 100 block of West D Street on the afternoon of May 29. Nancy Hansen was booked into the County Jail in Vista on suspicion of resisting arrest and an outstanding felony warrant. According to jail records, she remains jailed pending a court appearance June 8; she also faces a felony complaint alleging possession of a controlled substance.
  • Deputies detained a juvenile after receiving a complaint from the located at 100 Encinitas Boulevard on the afternoon of May 28. The unidentified minor was accused of stealing about $30 worth of food, according to a report. Juvenile authorities will review the matter.
  • A 55-year-old woman was arrested on a felony charge after a disturbance was reported in the 200 block of West G Street on the evening of May 28. An unnamed victim reported a minor injury, allegedly caused by the suspect, Lorraine Nugent.
  • A 28-year-old woman was arrested on suspicion of felony shoplifting at the located at 1400 Encinitas Boulevard shortly after 2 a.m. on May 26. Deputies were called after Amber Hamzey allegedly attempted to take a number of food items valued at $11. She was arrested about an hour after the call in Carlsbad, according to a report, and booked into the County Jail in Vista.
  • A 29-year-old man was found beaten in the 1000 block of S. Coast Highway 101 on the evening of May 24. The man's injuries were described as major. No suspect information was reported.
  • A 45-year-old man was found suffering from what was described as a severe cut in the 1200 block of S. Coast Highway 101 on the afternoon of May 23. The case was investigated as an assault. No suspect information was listed.
  • Five juveniles were detained after a disturbance was reported in the 3300 block of Manchester Avenue on the morning of May 22. All were released shortly before 4 a.m. though one of the juveniles, whose name was not released, was suspected of resisting arrest, a misdemeanor, and possession of marijuana and smoking paraphernalia. The others were suspected of possessing smoking paraphernalia.
  • Robert Collins, 58, was arrested on an undisclosed outstanding felony warrant in the 100 block of W. Glaucus Street on the morning of May 21. He was booked into the County Jail in Vista.
  • A 27-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of drunken driving and violating probation following a traffic stop in the 100 block of Encinitas Boulevard during the early morning hours of May 16. Jehonathan Poellnitz was booked into the County Jail in Vista.
  • Hanson's Surf Shop reported a vandalism incident on the afternoon of May 13. The owner reported $125 worth of damage to a structure at 1100 S. Coast Highway 101. No suspect information was reported.

Vehicle thefts reported:

  • 1700 block of Neptune Avenue on the evening of May 28. White pickup truck valued at $5,000.
  • 800 block of Oceancrest Road on the morning of May 22. Gray pickup truck valued at $15,000.
  • 100 block of South Jayton Lane on the morning of May 21. Silver, two-door vehicle valued at $5,500.
  • 3100 block of Via De Caballo on the evening of May 24. Black Night Train motorcycle valued at $16,000.

Vehicle burglaries reported: (stolen items valued at $485 to $1,380)

  • 100 block of Basil Street on the evening of May 25.
  • 1300 block of S. Coast Highway 101 on the morning of May 24.
  • 1300 block of Saxony Avenue on the evening of May 24.

Residential burglaries, hot prowls, or grand theft from buildings: (items valued at $1,000 to $25,000)

  • Filiberto's Taco shop reported the loss of a $2,500 kitchen appliance at 400 S. Coast Highway 101 on the afternoon of May 29.
  • 1500 block of Orangeview Drive on the afternoon of May 21.
  • 15800 block of The River Trail on the morning of May 23.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.