.
Feedback

Suspect in Standoff Found Dead of Self-Inflicted Gunshot

The 22-year-old suspect was found dead of a self- inflicted gunshot wound early Thursday.

Also read: 2 Deputies Wounded in Shooting

A 22-year-old man accused of shooting two deputies and holding up in his mother's Encinitas home—prompting a 10-hour SWAT standoff that displaced about 25 residents—was found dead of a self- inflicted gunshot wound early Thursday, authorities said.

The incident in the 700 block of Del Rio Avenue near Leucadia Boulevard began around 1 p.m. Wednesday with a woman reporting that her adult son was upset that she had recently obtained a restraining order against him and had taken off in her car, according to the San Diego County Sheriff's Department.

He returned to the home shortly after 3:30 p.m. and deputies tried to talk to him inside the residence, department spokeswoman Melissa Aquino said in a statement.

Several patrol deputies entered the home with the mother's consent and established verbal contact with the man, sheriff's Capt. Duncan Fraser told reporters at the scene.

"After several minutes of negotiation with him, which was unsuccessful, and because of some statements he was making they deployed less lethal tear gas," Fraser said. "Unfortunately, the male returned fire, striking two deputies."

The wounded deputies were then evacuated and sent to hospitals, he said.

One of the deputies was wounded in the forehead and the other, in the leg, according to Aquino. Both were expected to survive.

After shots were fired, the suspect stayed inside. Crisis negotiators and SWAT teams from around the county flocked to the scene, and for several hours, negotiators were in contact with the suspect, authorities said.

Around 1:30 a.m. Thursday, robots were sent into the home to check on the suspect and about 10 minutes after that, SWAT officers entered and found the man dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, Aquino said.

During the standoff, the Red Cross turned the Encinitas Community Center into a shelter for about 25 area-residents displaced by the police activity. Those residents were expected to be allowed back in their homes during the night, Aquino said.

The deputy who was shot in the forehead was treated and released from the hospital, according to Aquino. She said the other was admitted into Scripps La Jolla Hospital in stable condition. Their names were not immediately released.

Al Ein February 21, 2013 at 11:02 am
Can't wait to hear the answer to this one- Who is picking up the tab for this $500,000 cost and all the disturbance for a 5 mile radius? Plus the cost for all the other areas that went without Police service tonight and the cost for all the people that suffered tonight due to no police service. Cities need to be accountable for their actions. Who is picking up the cost for this fiasco and why was the helicopter needed for 10 hours?
Violet February 21, 2013 at 11:05 am
25 residents displaced? Not really!! Lots more had to go to friends' or relatives' homes. We couldn't get into our homes, regardless of the aged relatives or pets who needed us. Ridiculous gunman & illogical crowd control by the police. While we couldn't get in/home & would not have driven by the home in question, some people were let out & drove right by the house with the SWAT team at work!
Anna Anikanova February 21, 2013 at 12:04 pm
Cops did their jobs. I'm one of those people who stops the whole tradfic and lets our cops go through on the highway. I'm sorry for everyone who has to stay out of ther homes but justice was served and cops did their jobs. If you dolt like how it's done go live in a different country. Be an American and if I dolt like it go love somewhere else. Blessings to everyone to supports our police and those police officers who spent all night driving this guy crazy. Our system is not perfect but it is OUR system and I'm proud of it.
Anna Anikanova February 21, 2013 at 12:05 pm
I consider this a win not a fiasco...
Bob Chase February 21, 2013 at 12:51 pm
At times I question the number of officers it takes to respond and quell a situation. With one guy hold up as confirmed initially why all the collateral equipment and personnel?
KT February 21, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Yes this worked out well. Why are you people complaining? Remember new town? Be grateful!
Shawn Knudsen February 21, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Why don't we all see the real tragedy here. A mother lost her son and two cops were shot who are thankfully gonna be ok but nontheless. Clearly he was disturbed and they took precautions by having people in the houses around clear out because who knows what this guy had planned. There is so much ugliness in this world so instead of beating this up and saying what went wrong and who should pay for what, have a little compassion for the people who were directly affected in this situation and be thankful it didn't get worse! The world had enough hate.
Marnie February 21, 2013 at 01:19 pm
My heart and prayers goes out for the young mans mother , I too recently have lost my 24 year old son and know the pain and suffering she is about to indure for the rest of her life , also my prayers are with the young man,s soul , he was hurting inside , it is the tough society we live in that is causing so many young men in able to cope , and the lack of God and Love in our school systems , as far as the police , thank you ---- to protect and serve and you did ....
Melissa Spiegler February 21, 2013 at 02:06 pm
Beautifully Stated Marnie!!...My sentiments exactly.
Matt Weddle February 21, 2013 at 02:19 pm
Couldn't agree more, Marnie. Such a truly tragic situation to occur because of a mother-son dispute and a stolen car. It's unfortunate that people would be so immediately concerned with the monetary cost rather than the cost of human life and suffering. Law enforcement overreaction is understandable due to the recent rash of gun violence (New Town, Chris Dorner), but the real question is: how could the police have handled the situation differently to avoid unnecessary suicide? DID POLICE OVERREACTION AND MEDIA HYPE CONTRIBUTE TO A YOUNG MAN''S DEATH?
Jay Berman February 21, 2013 at 02:26 pm
THat's what we pay taxes for ....
D.C. February 21, 2013 at 02:41 pm
May the young man's soul find peace and peacefully crossover, and may the mother find healing and guidance through her long and arduous journey through grief. May the injured officers find purpose in their injuries and come out the other end transformed as better people. May the mother experience this as well. Blessings to all.
Jayelle February 21, 2013 at 03:37 pm
Thank you to the persons who have a deeper understanding of what really happened in this scenario. I too sit in silence for the mother of that misguided "child"...yes, to a parent, our children will always be our child. If each of us would educate ourselves about the growing numbers who suffer from mental illness we might also be able to support science and medicine who spend their lives looking for help rather than spewing damnation. Do you know how many hours the average person plays video games...just on their comptuter? Imagine what we as a society could offer one another if we shifted our priorities to what is really important...the growth of understanding, compassion and forgiveness would flourish...as would yours and your children's love of life and mankind.
Pete February 21, 2013 at 03:55 pm
"self inflicted gun shot" Yeah right
Frank H. Robles February 21, 2013 at 07:56 pm
The police did well in locking down and securing the area. With no way of knowing who his friends are, and trying to keep bystanders away, a large force was brought in. As the sun was setting, you would see many police leaving and some staying. I live just one block over, had a chance to talk to some on the scene. They went about their duties in a very respectfull way. Had no problem sleeping at home, with this going on such a few homes away. Like to take the time to Thank the S.D. Sheriff Dept.. " Well Done"...!!!
Sarah Riccitelli February 21, 2013 at 09:27 pm
Wishing well to everyone involved & I hope that the young man rests in peace & his mom finds peace as well.
Al Ein February 22, 2013 at 11:22 am
Really?
They had a 20 year old drug addict pinned down in one home. Totally surrounded. His beef was he was pissed at his mom for the restraining order. There were several full SWAT teams there surrounding the house. Why the other 300 cops? Why the helicopter buzzing the neighborhood for 10 hours? How many Police and fire personnel were on the scene? Why did they bring in 300 cops from as far away from Chula Vista? What was the total responding personnel and what was the total cost? Who is picking up the cost for the operation? City or County? Did other City's PD chiefs volunteer to send their cops in to "stand guard"? Well Done- If you like a complete waste of taxpayers money. I think the City's have plenty of projects they'd like to get built and wasting $500,000 to $1,000,000 for flying and standing around all night doesn't accomplish anything. I think it was a huge overkill and someone should be held accountable. What were the costs?
Al Ein February 22, 2013 at 11:32 am
Hear is my guestimate of the costs
1. Helicopter- 10 hours @ $1,000 per hour including pilots and others in bird- $10k 2. Cops- 300 @ $250/hr. including everything from cars/benefits and salary= $75,000 3. Unnecessary Disturbance to Encinitas- $10,000 (Many displaced residents and many sleepless people from helicopter buzzing all night= $10,000 4. Cost for other agencies to have no police services for that time all the officers were in encinitas= $50,000 Total cost between $145,000 to $200,000. In my opinion, someone went way overboard and cost the taxpayer big time.
Jay Berman February 22, 2013 at 01:28 pm
20 year old drug addict had weapons he seemed to be good at using, shot 2 cops ... they had to secure the area, takes bodies and equipment .. what if the doper just started firing away because he had nothing to lose ? Who are you to second guess ? You were not there in a possible line of fire ... the event ended, no one was killed except the doper ... this is what we pay taxes for ... you want to go after waste in Encinitas, let's start with a $5.5m pedestrian underpass at Swami's or a $5m fire station more than 3 times larger than the one it replaced ... the purchase of the Mossy property. prime realestate .. or $19M for a huge park on prime commercial property ... we can talk waste ....

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.