.
Feedback

New Encinitas City Council Swears in; Chooses Barth as Mayor

The Encinitas City Council chose Teresa Barth as Mayor and Lisa Shaffer as Deputy Mayor shortly after swearing in.

An overflow crowd watched as Tony Kranz, Mark Muir and Lisa Shaffer took the oath of office as the city’s newly elected City Council members. The three broke with tradition and took the oath simultaneously.

A handful of attendees stood up and sang, “if you’re happy and you know it clap your hands,” as many responded by clapping loudly.

In his last act as Mayor, Jerome Stocks, who lost his bid for re-election, motioned to certify the results of the Nov. 6 election. In addition to the new council members, voters approved a proposition that will allow for a directly elected mayor to serve a two-year term beginning with the 2014 election. Councilman Jim Bond, who retired from the council after serving 20 years, cast his last vote in favor of the motion.

Retiring district three County Supervisor Pam Slater-Price and her newly elected replacement, Dave Roberts were two of the many familiar faces seated in the gallery.

Tom Frank, a Leucadia resident congratulated the new council. “That’s a great looking council,” he said. “Congratulations to the residents of Encinitas.” 

Barb Yost, one of the nine candidates who ran for three spots on the council also addressed the new council. “It was a privilege running with you all,” she said. “Actually, it was a lot of fun. It’s a new day in Encinitas.”

Her reference to the shifting balance of power on the five-member council was a common refrain throughout the meeting. Councilwoman Teresa Barth supported Kranz and Shaffer, while Bond and Deputy Mayor Kristen Gaspar supported Muir and Stocks. 

The most anticipated portion of the meeting was the selection of the mayor and deputy mayor. The mood was much more upbeat than last year’s selection meeting, when over three-fourths of those in attendance stood with their backs to the dais when Gaspar and Stocks were selected by a majority vote of the council.

The silent protest marked the third time Barth had been passed over for the leadership positions. Despite the rotational process of each council member moving to the next seat until they reach the Deputy Mayor and then Mayor’s spot, Barth, now in her second term in office, had yet to receive enough council votes to serve in either capacity.

During the previous year’s mayoral vote, Barth supporters shouted in outrage after Bond, Stocks and Gaspar voted for the 2011 leadership positions. Late Councilwoman Maggie Houlihan and Barth voted against Bond for Mayor and Stocks for Deputy Mayor, saying it did not follow the longstanding rotational history of selecting the two posts.

What came as a surprise to many in the audience was Gaspar’s announcement that she would not accept a nomination for a leadership post.

Barth responded that she believes in the rotational system and was prepared to follow it. However, as the most senior member on the council, with 6 years under her belt, she said she felt like “the last man standing.”

“I don’t want this evening to be about getting even,” she said. “Tonight we are turning a page.” Barth said the recent past of the council had been “marred by bullying and petty politics,” but added, “I see a brighter future.”

Kranz’s nomination for Barth to assume the mayor’s position and Shaffer the deputy mayor post passed unanimously.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Olivier Canler December 12, 2012 at 02:13 am
Great Day for Encinitas! Hopefully under the leadership of Teresa and Lisa, this new council will show better civility and listening skills than the previous council. It's a good think Gaspar did not seek the nomination. Her name is stained with the feel-good, partisan, and childish "We Love Encinitas" campaign.
The honeymoon will be short as some major issues are appearing in the horizon: The General Plan Update is very contentious and stalled, the pension system needs a serious look at, and the Pacific View Property future does not seem to want to go away. Good luck!
Xavier December 12, 2012 at 04:25 am
What is stained is Mr. Canler's hands by running an initiative based up a lie and using the signature gathering process to campaign against (Muire and Stocks) and for (Kranz and Shaffer) in total violation of the law. In addition, the initiative campaign was funded by a Carlsbad non-profit (North County Advocates, run by Bruce Ehlers), again in total violation of both State and Federal nonprofit law. Those who live in glass houses, shouldn't cast stones. No side is this past election has clean hands. So if you truly want peace on our new council please stop trying to proclaim just the other side as dirty.
RATSJ December 12, 2012 at 04:35 am
Congratulations to our new mayor, Teresa, and Deputy Mayor Lisa. We will finally have civility on the council. As I clearly remember the troubles on the council began when Christy Guerin showed her ugly face and it continued to go south from then on. Let's never let those kind of people represent us ever again. May Jerome RIP!
Al Ein December 12, 2012 at 10:46 am
Congrats to the new council. Xavier is just bent because the special interest issues such as increased pensions, and increasing density and building heights in our small beach town need to be discussed in open forum. No more back room deals means much more work and less profits for the Employee Unions, Developers, and Big buck CEO of private sports leagues looking for public substitutes for field time, so they can pay themselves even higher salaries. Let the sunshine in!!!
Olivier Canler December 12, 2012 at 01:38 pm
Mr Xavier seems like a disgruntled pro-development person that's throwing a tantrum because he is not getting his way.
The initiative PAC has not endorsed any candidate. And has not campaigned for or against candidates. We are apolitical. We are glad to see that some candidates supported our views and efforts during the campaign. We are a PAC not a non-profit and since we do not support candidates our PAC can receive contribution over $250 such as the contribution from North County Advocates. I am not sure what lie is Mr Xavier would be referring to since the high density proposals are taken straight from SANDAG and ERAC recommendations. All public documents. Anyway I welcome a new tone on council and a healthy debate over important short and long term issues.
Marcia Ledesma December 13, 2012 at 03:33 am
I worked writing about politics for newspaper in my home country. Over there here is the saying: "New pretty faces sweep with ugly broom." After elections I made predictions. You decide how close I get. Wait two years and tell me. Here is what I predict:
1. New council members always vote same way as new mayor. 2. New council members spend thousands of dollars for new office furniture to replace old furniture. 3. New council member say they need new computer in offices at city hall. 4. New mayor gives special awards to her friends. Two years equals at least 12 special awards for really no big deal. Photos are printed in Coast News on front page. 5. After stopping all work on everything, new council blames other council for not improving roads and infrastructure. Nothing gets finished. 6. All work to upgrade city of Encinitas stops so new council can look at contracts and plans approved by previous council. This is what they will say. 7. Heavy rain is blamed on climate change and new mayor says all the flooding is not there fault. 8. School district offices are inside five-story building after View Pacific School gets new name and zone rules are changed because school with other name is not there anymore. 9. Many city employees are fired. They sue city and win lots of money. 10. Complaining will stop for a while. But when complaining comes back again, same people who complained before will be complaining again like last time. I hope I am wrong.
RATSJ December 13, 2012 at 03:45 am
If you're such a brainiac, why didn't you run for council since you have all the answers?
Lynn Marr December 13, 2012 at 10:16 am
Olivier, I can't tell you enough how much the efforts of you, your wife and all the initiative volunteers are appreciated. I hope that people will continue to sign the petition which would enable the public to vote on amendments to Specific Plans and our now being revised General Plan, that enough signatures can be gathered so that Council can adopt the initiative, as written. That would be a huge benefit to all of those who live in and love our beachside town. It would also ensure more open, equitable government!
Lynn Marr December 13, 2012 at 10:31 am
Yes, congratulations to Mayor Teresa Barth & Deputy Mayor Lisa Shaffer. I feel that Councilmember Kristin Gaspar did the gracious thing, under the circumstances. In my opinion, Teresa Barth should have stepped up & accepted the reigns of leadership. She had more experience on Council; she had been passed over 3 times; the public had VOTED OUT the rotational system.
Contracts should be re-examined, annually, particularly when they are for $100,000 per year, or more. The City's relationship with private contractors, as well as its subsidization of non-profits should be agendized, & discussed publicly. I concur that sometimes too many "awards" are given by non-profits seeking favors & subsidies through the City. All non-profits should have to apply, yearly, for community grants, no exceptions for business associations which sometimes act as lobbyists for a particular agenda. Yes, from my experience, also, the troubles on council began with Christy Guerin. Now that Bilbray wasn't re-elected, perhaps she can become a crossing guard again? Both she & her husband, a "Colonel" in the Sheriff's Department, are living "off the public trough." Both have received disability compensation, through the County Sheriff. Christy's husband appealed his, to get a greater settlement, which was denied. Christy gets about $3,000 per month "retirement disability for stress fractures" although she's run in relays, in addition to her salary as Billbray's District Manager.
Lynn Marr December 13, 2012 at 10:43 am
I don't think you're right about the new office furniture, Marcia, I hope not, or new computers. I don't care for the "special awards," either. Special awards & presentations should be agendized in such a way that public speakers can add our two cents. They shouldn't be on the agenda only as a PR moment for incumbents, no matter who the incumbents are.
With respect to "stopping all work on everything," that's not happening. However, some work, such as changing a major circulation element by eliminating one lane northbound on a major roadway MANDATES amendments to the 101 Corridor Specific Plan, the General Plan (being updated), and the Local Coastal Program, with a finding that lane reduction will not adversely affect operational adequacy, after environmental review, through the California Environmental Quality Act. We shouldn't rush ahead with projects, including an ill-conceived "lane diet" which will make Neptune & all streets west of North Highway 101, as well as Vulcan, a school zone LESS walkable due to more cut through traffic, & which lane diet will also negatively impact our neighborhoods with slower emergency response time. I'm very grateful Councilmember Tony Kranz asked for an agenda item to be set on this to make sure "we're doing things right." However, the road re-lining should not continue, so that the lane diet is implemented before this needed public discussion. I feel you're wrong, too, Marcia, about most of your predictions.
Miss Peach December 15, 2012 at 12:37 am
Like most corny soothsayers, your "predictions" are vague and cover every facet of human behavior. I won't be "crossing your palm with silver" any time soon, Madame Marcia, for in my country, we have a saying: "Talk Is Cheap".
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Mary E June 19, 2013 at 04:01 pm
do you get a donation receipt for tax purposes?
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.