.
Feedback

City Council Candidates Make Their Final Pitch to Voters

Eight hopefuls weighed in on key topics during Tuesday night’s forum, which drew a full house.

Encinitas voters came out in full force Tuesday night for the last city council candidate forum of the season.

Of the nine hopefuls vying for one of three seats, eight turned out: Thomas Brophy, Kevin Forrester, Tony Kranz, Mark Muir, Lisa Shaffer, Jerome Stocks, Barbara Yost, and Bryan Ziegler. Candidate Peter Schuh did not attend.

The forum—which was hosted by the Leucadia and New Encinitas town councils and moderated by the League of Women Voters—drew about 150 voters. During the two-hour event, they had a chance to hear candidates weigh in on everything from pension reform to seawalls.

The moderator said topics were selected based on the questions submitted by audience members.

“A very popular subject matter,” she said, was centered on a recent video shot by a resident that shows Stocks and Muir posting their campaign signs before it was allowed under the city code. 

Muir said he was confused about the dates, calling the mistake “my bad”—and joking that he didn’t like watching the video online because it made him realize he had a “big butt,” which got a laugh from the audience.

Stocks said that other candidates also violated the ordinance. He claimed that Kranz said some of his signs were stolen out of his garage and posted early, which the audience responded to with booing so loud the moderator banged her gavel to restore order in the room.

Shaffer said she had gone to great lengths to abide by the code, even asking volunteers to take down signs that were posted early. She also said she thought it was inappropriate for elected officials to violate the code because “if you’re sworn in to uphold it, you uphold it—no ifs, ands or buts.”

Kranz said he was not sure who had posted some of his signs early, but made it clear he discouraged it. He also said though the ordinance was “probably unconstitutional” because it infringes on freedom of speech, it was on the books and he’d “pledged to uphold it.”

Zeigler, Yost and Brophy all said they agreed that the code should be respected—with Brophy adding that the real issue behind the video boils down to how it makes voters feel when they watch it because “it gives the perception they’re playing the game in a way that’s not fair to all.”

Forrester said he’d watched the video and said he considered the violation of the code “an offensive, but not a capital offense.”

Another key topic was the was centered on downtown bars, which some voters feel are feeding a growing problem caused by drunk and rowdy weekend crowds. The moderator asked each candidate what he or she would propose doing to address the issue.

Zeigler said increased law enforcement was the answer, recommending a saturation of deputies downtown, and suggesting that the fire marshal regularly sweep through the bars to ensure they’re running a tight ship—and if they’re found to be in violation, the city should prosecute and shut them down. Forrester said he supported those ideas.

Yost said she’d bring in a conflict resolution specialist to work with business owners and nearby residents.

Stocks said he saw this as a quality of life issue because many of the bar patrons park on residential streets and disturb homeowners. He proposed valet services to remedy that, and suggested restaurant owners organize a group to help monitor the area.

Brophy said he thought the nightlight culture was the source of the issue, so he’d like to see a “creative solution” between the bar owners and “the people causing the trouble,” though he did not give any examples. 

Kranz said he’d like to see the city council take a leadership role on the issue and cited a recent stabbing at a local bar, adding he’d like to see a remedy before someone is seriously injured or even killed in another bar fight.

Muir said he's encouraged community groups, residents and bar owners to come up with a solution, and he’s waiting to hear about those ideas before deciding how to best move forward.

Shaffer suggested servers be better trained about when to limit alcohol to customers, and cited a solution in Ventura, where restaurant owners were charged a fee if they stayed open later to serve alcohol, and that extra money was used to beef up law enforcement around the bars.

If you plan to vote in the upcoming election, you must be registered by Oct. 22. For information about how to register to vote in Encinitas, check out Patch’s online guide.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jodina Hahn Gallo May 21, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Ciao Pam! Grazie per il tuo bel commento! / Thanks for your nice comment! Hope your trip to ItaliaRead More was fabulous. Buona giornata :)
Pam May 21, 2013 at 06:52 am
Took this class before a trip to Italy. Very fun and was able to learn quickly with the way theRead More class was taught. Great instructor and wonderful insights. You will enjoy it if you ever wanted to learn Italian. Caio!
ron ranson May 21, 2013 at 09:34 am
This is wonderful news. Congratulations to the students, their instructors and Academy staffRead More members -- and to the supportive parents. A theatre education is the best!
Daniel Woolfolk (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 03:08 pm
Hi Edward, I didn't hear any reports on the scanner or from sources of crashes, rescues or hardRead More landings.
John E May 20, 2013 at 09:33 am
The public deserves an objective, unemotional, factual public debate on this proposition. So far IRead More am still leaning toward a yes vote, but I am keeping an open mind at least through this month.
Status Quo May 22, 2013 at 10:24 am
It is clear... 'Jac' beyond, his conflation to compare American performance on women's issues inRead More America and conformity to UN wants?, is non-comfortability within his own skin and spurned country. This tack(conflation to UN), opens up a wider discussion of the UN being a non-credible agent(documented abuse) in women's rights. Personal observations of 'Jac's offerings, is undue bias and regressive hyper-activity. I will consider your apparent request, by possibly publishing my withheld comments from the articles' original inappropriate reference to that abusive body - the UN and your coveted CEDAW. It is rather long-winded and fully explanatory of abuses by the UN, committed by UN agents and representatives - amounting to crimes(non-jurisdictional) in our country's law already. On your more localized non-issue of ERA, some may take offense at your Ad Hominems but I need not thank you again for the opening to return the favor(s). Contained in my earlier withheld remarks, an mild admonition to 'Batman' for the harshness of his tone but you seem to deserve the distinction he bestowed upon your recurring bias. Thanks again, for the standing to bring a personal tone to the discussion, less need for reviewing my forward remarks and the skewed analysis your repeatedly offer in your tomes. As said, I had already conceived my thoughts and need only to press 'Post comment' but I find them a bit biting and worthy of self-moderation outside the facts presented for your backwoods approval.
Status Quo May 22, 2013 at 09:09 am
Thank goodness 'Jac' you are neither a Judge or member of Congress. The attempt at Ad Hominem isRead More appreciated however, true to your form. 'Grown-up' appears to be whoever agrees with you and not based in law or process.
Jac Flanders May 21, 2013 at 10:49 pm
Thanks for your comment, Frank. I'm certain you're not the only grownup reader of the blog - justRead More the only one so far. (At first, I thought some guys were putting me on; they have to be kidding.) You're right, of course, some Democrats voted against the E.R.A. for women. Shamefully, they and a majority of Republicans have defeated each attempt to pass the amendment so far. I still find it almost unbelievable that some of our neighbors think women do not deserve equal rights under the law. I thought that kind of thinking existed only in Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, and some backwoods places in Tennessee.
Frank H. Robles May 20, 2013 at 11:48 am
Stopped by Sunday to take a Look, very nice homes, good location, fair asking price, should sellRead More well...!!!
Sallie Mazzur January 28, 2013 at 11:39 pm
Well said, Nama. I was speechless to see how many people Uncle Ben had influenced during his life,Read More but it's no wonder. There may be one less Ben Taylor in our lives, but Heaven just got a whole lot more fun!
Daniel Woolfolk (Editor) January 24, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Thanks, Kyle for posting this. I'm not sure how things were in the past, but as a Patch editor, I'veRead More seen that blogging and engaging readers directly is a great way to market a book. Steve Repak, a financial planner with a military-themed personal finance book, blogs regularly on Patch and has recently been featured in National Media. Here's that story: http://oceanside-camppendleton.patch.com/articles/steve-repak-featured-on-npr-fox-friends