.
Feedback

Public Invited to Encinitas Fire Station Opening

Fire Chief Scott Henry believes the Grand Opening of Fire Station #2 symbolizes a new era and the continuing dedication of his department and staff to the community.

The Encinitas Fire Department invites members of the public to attend a Grand Opening of Fire Station #2 in Cardiff-by-the-Sea at 2 p.m. Feb. 22. The station opened on January 7, 2013, with crews moving in and responding to calls from their new home.

As the second fire station built in what is now the City of Encinitas, the original, 1,600-square-foot Fire Station #2, constructed in 1960, was greatly in need of replacement to better serve the safety needs of the community. In 2011, the City Council approved construction of a more spacious (6,330-square-foot), modern and environmentally-friendly facility at 618 Birmingham Drive, just east of the old station’s location at 1867 McKinnon Avenue. Construction costs totaled $4.6 million.

Fire Department Deputy Chief Mike Daigle says the Grand Opening will be an exciting event. He reveals, “We plan to incorporate many time-honored ‘firehouse’ traditions dating back to the 19th-century days of horse-drawn engines. Instead of a ribbon-cutting, the event will feature a unique ‘hose-uncoupling’ followed by a very special activity in which the sparkling fire engine, newly ‘wetted down,’  is actually pushed by Fire Department staff into the confines of the station.”

Deputy Chief Daigle explains, “The pushing of the rig celebrates the days when the horse-drawn  apparatus had to be physically pushed by humans into the station.”

The Grand Opening festivities also will feature a formal dedication, facility tours, mementos and refreshments. More information is on the Department’s website, Facebook and Twitter.

The antiquated and cramped Fire Station #2 needed expensive and extensive repairs, which made replacement of the facility the most viable option. The new station, in addition to housing one fire engine (with a crew of three firefighters) and one ambulance (with a crew of two emergency medical personnel) offers the capacity to house three additional firefighters in times of need. It also offers abundant space for public interaction, maintenance, training and fulfillment of daily living and working needs.

The station meets U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) standards for Silver certification. Environmental  features include best management practices for trash disposal, recycling, erosion control and storm water management, energy-efficient lighting and low-water-use landscaping.

Fire Chief Scott Henry, who has served the Encinitas Fire Department since 1980, believes the Grand Opening of Fire Station #2 symbolizes a new era and the continuing dedication of his department and staff to the community. Chief Henry states, “We are pleased and proud to be able to offer the community of Cardiff-by-the-Sea and the entire City of Encinitas this gleaming new station that is able to meet the requirements of the vicinity, City and region; today and into the future.”

—City News Service

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter

Jay Berman February 1, 2013 at 04:02 pm
Why in the world do we need a 6300 SqF firehouse in Cardiff ???? Mostly residential 1 and 2 story buildings ... Sure, a new firehouse was needed .. but this is a monument to government largess and waste ... 1600 SqF has been sufficient for 53 years .... Cardiff hasn't changed much ... It's not like we have a lot of fires here ...
Last year there was a car accident right next to the old station 2 in front of that large apartment complex ... they "rolled" a firetruck and ambulance 50 feet ... This louzy underpass at Swami's .... $5m taking forever to build ... an underpass more than a 6300 SqF fire station .... amazing waste ....
Jessie Taylor February 2, 2013 at 03:04 am
Remember your comments here when your house catches fire, or you need help from the EMTs.
Jay Berman February 2, 2013 at 05:05 am
That would be pretty sad Jessie ... I only want to know, as a taxpayer in Encinitas, why we need such a large firestation .. Am I asking too much ? Would 3000 SqF be too little ? I mean, nothing has changed much here in Cardiff by the Sea ..
Al Ein February 5, 2013 at 12:46 am
Another $5 million dollars spent for the comforts of 9 to 10 fighterfighters. It does nothing for response times and does very little for the quality of life for the community. What it does do is take tax dollars for other needed projects that would benefit the public. What a wasted opportunity for tax dollars, but what do you expect from the greedy fire fighters that want never ending comforts and pay for little work. I think a good strategy would be to have 3 8 hour shift with no overtime and make up routines so they all can work during their 8 hour shifts instead of shopping, sleeping, watching movies, working out, BBQing, watching the Super Bowl, and other tasks that other taxpayers do in their off time. Man- The tax payers get ripped again from the fire fighters. Ugggg.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
gay_wayland June 16, 2013 at 06:20 am
when and where is the sale? Where should donations be taken?
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.