.
Feedback

San Diego Jobs PAC Endorse Danon for County Supervisor

The group represents local employers.

Editor's Note: Steve Danon is a candidate for County Supervisor in San Diego’s Third District. The following news release is from his political campaign party, Steve Danon for Supervisor - 2012.

[updated March 25] The original version of this news release listed Scripps Health. That was later removed because though Scripps Health is a member of the Downtown Partnership that sponsors the Jobs PAC, is not affiliated with the Jobs PAC itself.

Also, the news release was updated to reflect that Scott Maloni is the Chair of the Jobs PAC, not the Partnership.

The San Diego Jobs PAC, representing many local employers, today announced their endorsement of Steve Danon, who is a candidate for County Supervisor in San Diego’s Third District.

The San Diego Jobs PAC is focused on the importance of job creation and economic growth in the San Diego region.  It represents some of San Diego County’s leading employers, including Scripps Health, Bridgepoint Education, Cox Communications, AT&T and many more.

“We are pleased to support Steve Danon for County Supervisor,” said Scott Maloni, Chair of the San Diego Downtown Partnership, the sponsor of the Jobs PAC.  “We know that Steve understands the importance of opposing fees and regulations that will inhibit job-growth and supports incentives for businesses to relocate and create jobs within our community,” explained Maloni. “Steve has our full support.”

“I’m truly honored to have the support of many of our region’s biggest job-creators,” said Danon.  “With nearly one in ten San Diegans out of work, my number-one priority is to promote job-growth,” Danon continued.  “With my private-sector experience, having founded and built a local business, I know what it takes to help local businesses succeed, and I look forward to working with San Diego’s business community to create employment opportunities for San Diego residents – many of whom are struggling with under- or unemployment,” concluded Danon.

The Danon campaign has garnered significant, broad-based support from across the district on a range of issues.  An impressive list of organizations, community leaders and elected officials including Former Governor Pete Wilson, San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders, The California Republican Party, The San Diego County Republican Party, The Lincoln Club of San Diego County, The New Majority,  Father Joe Carroll, Former U.S. Secretary for Veterans Affairs Anthony Principi, Congressman Brian Bilbray, Congressman Darrell Issa, Congressman Duncan D. Hunter, former Congressman Ron Packard, California State Senator Joel Anderson, California State Senator Wadie Deddeh (ret.), California State Assemblyman Nathan Fletcher, California State Assemblyman Brian Jones, San Diego County Supervisor Ron Roberts, Escondido Mayor Sam Abed, Encinitas Mayor and Chairman of SANDAG Jerome Stocks, San Marcos Mayor Jim Desmond, San Diego City Council President Pro Tem Kevin Faulconer, San Diego City Councilmember Lorie Zapf, Former San Diego City Councilmembers Brian Maienschein, Barbara Warden, Jim Madaffer and Judy McCarty, Lemon Grove Mayor and former SANDAG Chairwoman Mary Sessom, Encinitas City Councilmember James Bond, Escondido Councilmember Ed Gallo, Escondido Councilmember Mike Morasco, Escondido Councilmember Marie Waldron, Former Escondido City Councilmembers Jerry Kaufman and Dick Daniels, County School Board Members Susan Hartley and John Witt, Del Mar Union School District Board Trustee Doug Perkins, President of the Sweetwater Unified School District Board John McCann, Encinitas City Deputy Mayor Kristin Gaspar, Encinitas City Councilman and former Fire Chief Mark Muir, Oceanside Councilmembers Jerry Kern and Gary Felien, Chief Lifeguard B. Chris Brewster (ret.), California Republican Party immediate past Chairman Ron Nehring, North County Republican Club, The San Diego Association REALTORS®, The North San Diego County Association of REALTORS®, Associated Building Contractors (ABC), Associated General Contractors (AGC), Building Industry Association (BIA), The San Diego County Apartment Association, San Diego County Probation Officers Association, The Deputy Sheriffs' Association, Deputy District Attorneys’ Association and San Diegans Against Crime, The San Diego Police Officers Association, Escondido Police Officers’ Association, Chula Vista Police Officers Association, Peace Officers Research Association, and the California Restaurant Association, San Diego Chapter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Rick Moore June 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
The consequences are fully articulated on DEMA's website. Prop A would be a tragic setback andRead More embarrassment for our city.
Encinitas YES on A June 17, 2013 at 01:20 pm
DEMA's website is hardly a resource for anything "articulate" on Prop A, unless you countRead More baldfaced lies as "consequences." Not only was DEMA's board not "unanimous" on the vote against A as Dody Crawford claimed (and later had to take back publicly), most downtown merchants have no clue what DEMA is saying on their behalf: the few I spoke with were horrified. Folks, read the initiative for yourselves and you'll see that only major zoning changes fall under Prop A: not the boat houses, not the La Paloma, and not the SRF (whose membership is very solidly a "Yes" on A.
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:37 am
An initiative to Prop A has worked in Escondido, without any lawsuits. "In the 26-yearRead More history of Encinitas, no council has ever used this provision to approve a major project without first a vote of the people." That's completely untrue. The North 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans were pushed through by the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and a supermajority of past Council AGAINST the wishes of citizens, against years of feedback from Specific Action Review Committees (Sparc)s and Community Advisory Boards (CABs), who wanted to stay with the limits of the General Plan of two stories, 30 ft, MAX, with certain exceptions, consistent with the Initiative! Just posting your opinion without any supporting evidence, Mr. Stocks, is only hurting your "cause." We and everyone we know, all our friends and neighbors, are voting YES on A! Voting YES is best if you want to take back your ability to help slow growth and to take back local control. Yes on A is a vote for Democracy and against insider influence and spinmaster jive promoted by marketing masters of misinformation, attempting to manipulate the uninformed masses with distortions of the truth. We don't need to be spoon-fed our opinions, but can think for ourselves, and act to protect and preserve our community character and our quality of life.
Greg Hay June 6, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Lies, lies and more lies. That's all the supporters of "No on Prop A" can come up with.Read More Even their slogan is weak and devoid of anything of substance… "It's not what it seems"… Really, THAT'S your argument against it?
BlueAngel2 June 6, 2013 at 07:22 pm
YES on PROP A which is NOT deeply flawed and very well written.
Robert June 3, 2013 at 04:16 pm
Thanks for tweeting this, Encinitas Patch. Exactly the kind of hard-hitting local coverage you can'tRead More get from legitimate news sources.