.
Feedback

Site for Sore Parties: Local Woman’s Volkalize.com Seeks to Bridge Divide

Rancho Santa Fe resident Jordan Bosstick: “We cannot have half the country watching liberal media, and the other half watching Republican media.”

Jordan Bosstick has big plans for her future—and America’s political discourse.

The 22-year-old who graduated with a bachelor’s in communications in May from Arizona State University, plans to launch Volkalize.com, a social networking site geared toward political conversations.

“Our country is extremely important to me, and I think that political issues should matter to everyone,” said Bosstick, who became engaged at an early age when her dad encouraged her to read the Wall Street Journal every day.

The Rancho Santa Fe resident, who isn’t yet sure whether the website will net an income, took time to Volkalize with Patch.

Patch: Why do you feel it’s important for Americans to engage in politics?

Bosstick: These days everyone is labeled as either a Republican or Democrat, and most people in between are so turned off by all the bickering that they tune it out completely. The two sides are so polarized that even our media caters to either one side or the other.

It is all so divisive. That’s why I created Volkalize.com, I wanted to create an unbiased space, where people aren’t labeled as Republican or Democrat. Social media is the best way to engage people.

On Volkalize.com, people can decide what topics matter to them; they can create a topic to discuss, or engage in a discussion already trending. We also make it easy for Volkalize.com members to share the entire discussion on other social media platforms, so their friends can read through the debate and get an understanding of the issue from their peers.

Our main message is “People, Power, Discussion.” The more people we can get engaged in political discussions, the more informed our society will be, which can only be good for our country. 

Patch: What is the ultimate goal behind the website?

Bosstick: The ultimate goal behind the website is to integrate politics with popular culture, by placing political discussions on the web. It is my hope that through the discussions on Volkalize.com, more people will become engaged and informed on the issues that face our country.

I especially hope to engage the people in the center that have felt overwhelmed by total polarization of the two political parties.

Patch: Will the comments be moderated or is it all free flowing? 

Bosstick: The comments will be moderated only if people get vulgar or start ranting anything hateful or obscene. I really want the discussions to be full of real solutions and ideas.

We have a “flag” function so users can let us know if people are being obscene, and we will remove problematic users if we need to.

Patch: What is your long-term goal for this website?  

Bosstick: My long-term goal is to engage more people in the political process, to remind people that this is America, and your engagement matters. The more people that are informed and involved in the process the easier it is to make a difference that benefits our country.

The debate has to be had. We cannot have half the country watching liberal media, and the other half watching Republican media. We will only end up divided and uneducated on each other’s true positions.

We have to debate and come up with the best solutions. We have to have the tough discussions respectfully between people that disagree, and let everyone else make up their own mind. I think everyone is tired of the partisan bickering, and is looking for serious solutions.

We can only have serious solutions if we all get involved, get informed, encourage others to get involved, and hold our government accountable.

The Volkalize.com homepage officially launched Feb. 11. and Bosstick said the full site will launch “soon.” Interested users can find Volkalize on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

RATSJ February 26, 2013 at 03:50 am
Nice try, but you will run into people who know everything and will pronounce any one else ignorant. We have seen it here on the Patch.
Barbara Yost February 26, 2013 at 03:52 pm
Your ideas are a breath of fresh air for us, but I fear that the damage that has been done will take a lot more to fix. It is, however, a very good start and I hope people partake in these discussions and learn from them. Not try to bully everyone else into their own agendas. Good forward thinking people are the people who are going to fix the great divide.
Jordan Bosstick February 26, 2013 at 06:21 pm
Thank you so much for the support Barbara!
bre February 28, 2013 at 09:02 pm
I believe Volkalize is spot on for the times and am very encouraged with this smart 22 year young Woman's presence on the internet. I look for great things from Volkalize.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Mary E June 19, 2013 at 04:01 pm
do you get a donation receipt for tax purposes?
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.