.
Feedback

State of the County Address Outlines Goals for 'Year of Austerity'

Chairman Bill Horn delivers a wide-ranging speech that calls for less regulation to keep the county's financial house in order.

Many of San Diego County's elected officials and public safety officers gathered at the County Administration Building on Wednesday night to hear the annual State of the County Address, delivered by Board of Supervisors Chairman Bill Horn.

While the speech touched on a wide range of issues—including crime, fire safety, disaster preparedness, development and transportation—Horn repeatedly cited fiscal responsibility and fewer government regulations as important for the future of the county.

Horn said San Diego County is in better fiscal health than the federal and state governments, which have not made the tough choices the county has made.

"The county of San Diego currently has a higher credit rating than both the state of California and the federal government," Horn said. "The problem is that we are tied to both."

Unfunded state mandates and raids on local funds are a threat to the county's coffers, Horn said, but his goal for what he called the "year of austerity" is to maintain the county's triple-A bond rating.

Public safety continues to be the top priority, Horn said. Despite tough economic times, crime rates in San Diego County continue to drop and Horn recognized Sheriff Bill Gore, District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis and those who serve in uniform. The launching of an e-mail system notifying residents if a sex offender moves in or out of their area and an initiative combating gang activity in North County were cited by Horn as success stories.

"We need to remain vigilant in the fight against predators in our communities," Horn said.

With San Diego's dry climate, wildfires will always be a threat, and Horn said he and Supervisor Pam Slater-Price have proposed adding $5 million to the $15 million the board allocates to the San Diego Fire Authority. He said the money will help build new training centers, buy new equipment and recruit volunteer firefighters.

Horn said that many areas in San Diego County have not burned in 60 years and environmental regulations have gotten in the way of fire safety.

"We continue to fight extreme environmentalism that has prevented us from removing large populations of dead, dying and diseased trees," Horn said.

The county continues to contract with CalFire, but that agency is facing at the mercy of a strapped state government.

"The governor's budget proposal to cut funding to CalFire is not good," Horn said. "However, we will do everything in our power to ensure that the county is prepared for the inevitable."

In the event a disaster does break out, fire trucks throughout the county have copies of The Red Guide to Disaster Recovery, which Horn said is the "most comprehensive individual guide to disaster recovery this county has ever seen." The guide is available to people who have lost their homes or possessions in a disaster.

Traffic congestion affects not only commute times but emergency response times as well. Horn said the San Diego Association of Governments' plan outlining highway and transit projects for the next 40 years will reduce congestion.

"By 2050 our region will add 200 miles of new trolley lines, double-track the Coaster and Sprinter lines and add lanes to I-15, I-5, state Route 76 and state Route 94."

Horn said that since 2005, 80 percent of all new private-sector jobs were created in Texas, and he'd like to see that happen in San Diego County. He said the passage of Proposition A will allow the county to bypass project labor agreements.

"In 2010, this board and the voters sent a message to organized labor that this county will not tolerate sweetheart deals with labor unions," Horn said. 

He also expressed his "staunch" defense for the rights of property owners as the reason he has been such a critic of the General Plan Update, noting that the government already owns more than half of the land in the county.

"I personally feel government does not have the right to devalue your land and leave you with the crumbs."

Horn, a Republican, couldn't resist a few pointed comments toward Gov. Jerry Brown and President Barack Obama. His comment about the new governor who will "promise you the moon" drew some groans from the audience, who remembered the "Gov. Moonbeam" nickname from Brown's first term.

Horn also mimicked Obama's campaign theme of "hope and change" after saying millions of Americans made it clear that they're not happy with the direction the United States has taken.

"The hope and change Americans were promised two years ago have proven to be little more than rhetoric," Horn said.

sluggo February 3, 2011 at 12:54 pm
My vision of the future has Horn no longer serving as a county supervisor. I'm disturbed by the things he's done with grant money. Support of your favorite religion with taxpayer dollars is unethical and unconstitutional. I don't agree with Horn's 'bulldoze everything that isn't already concrete and stucco' position, either.
San Diego voted to have term limits for Co. Supervisors in 2010, but this message apparently won't affect the supervisors, who will pretend the vote never happened. The lot of them have been sitting in those seats for nearly 20 years, now. Career politicians, permanently ensconced. We know power corrupts. We don't have to look to D.C. to see it. It's right here in our own backyards. They should all be ashamed of themselves.
Christine Huard (Editor) February 4, 2011 at 02:35 pm
Hi sluggo,
Thanks for weighing in on this story. The issues at hand are important to everyone and I hope this gets a conversation going here in Lemon Grove. Have a great day! Christine

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
The benefit garage and bake sale is this Saturday, June 22 from 7 a.m. to noon at 1463 Golden SunsetRead More Drive in San Marcos (San Elijo Hills). Here's the link to the event: http://encinitas.patch.com/groups/events/p/drake-center-garage-sale-to-benefit-autism-therapy-dog_3a2145e8
Dr. Michele Drake June 19, 2013 at 11:50 am
All donated items can be dropped off at The Drake Center, located at 195 N. El Camino Real inRead More Encinitas.
Mary E June 19, 2013 at 04:01 pm
do you get a donation receipt for tax purposes?
Vicki Campbell June 17, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Prop A will help residents and stop greedy developers from buying city council. Vote YES
Rick Moore June 18, 2013 at 09:27 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation that folks read the initiative. When you readRead More sections 6 and 9, you will see that Prop A sets a 30-foot or 2-story ceiling across the entire city, overriding lower height limits in many areas. The Downtown Specific Plan limits residences to 22-26 feet, as detailed on the DEMA website, so Prop A would actually allow the building of taller homes. It makes no exemptions or allowances for historic buildings like La Paloma, church towers or other structures over 30 feet high; the only exceptions are medical complexes and public high schools (see clause 6.2). Rebuilding or renovating (more than 50%) would require expensive public votes. Should the SRF be required to pay for an election to rebuild the Lotus Tower? Such contingencies are allowed for in our Historic Overlay Zone, which would clearly be overridden by Prop A. So is the Encinitas Preservation Association's plan to convert one of the boathouses to a museum. Again, Prop A would require an election (see section 4.1, clause e), which the EPA cannot afford. Prop A would thus favor large developers who have the money, time, lawyers and other resources to campaign for their project. How many nonprofits and small businessmen can afford to spend a minimum $30,000 just to get their project on a general election ballot (upwards of $300,000 for a special election like this one)? Yes, folks, please read the initiative, especially Section 9, which lays waste to anything that conflicts with it. That's why this has been dubbed Propzilla. I trust that most Encinitas citizens are smart enough to see that this meausre is deeply flawed, problematic and counter-productive. We can find much better ways to limit growth and preserve community character.
BlueAngel2 June 18, 2013 at 10:20 am
SAVE ENCINITAS FROM RANCID DEVELOPERS. VOTE YES ON PROP A!
BlueAngel2 June 15, 2013 at 09:47 pm
It would NOT surprise me. I thought we dumped Stocks. Why is he still around?
Encinitas YES on A June 16, 2013 at 02:44 pm
My YES on Prop. A sign was stolen yesterday. Other YES on Prop. A signs are disappearing. YetRead More another deceptive and untruthful mailer from the opponents of Prop. A was in my mail box. There's a shrillness and desperation in their opposition. They can't rely on facts and fair play. Polling data not looking good?
BlueAngel2 June 16, 2013 at 03:17 pm
YES ON PROP A will be victorious!
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 11:20 am
It just goes to show if Stocks or any of his puppets are involved, you will not hear the truth aboutRead More this proposition. They continue to confuse the issue. Please do not throw your vote away to ruin our city and enhance the developer's pockets who do not care what they do to our beautiful Encinitas. Vote YES on PROP A!
Status Quo June 19, 2013 at 11:53 am
Looks very much like your Prop A will pass, though 'BA2's tactic seems to be part of the problemRead More also.
TB-ENC June 7, 2013 at 02:01 pm
How is this not a racist group with Hispanics in California at 14 million second behind whites atRead More 14.8 million. We only need one chamber to represent all Californians.
BlueAngel2 June 8, 2013 at 02:09 pm
So any group other than white is a racist group?
Miranda Klassen June 5, 2013 at 10:39 am
Congrats to all on the groundbreaking. Reesey has done an incredible job with making Lux what it isRead More today!
BlueAngel2 June 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Vote YES on PROP A! The City Council is not experienced in real estate, zoning, construction orRead More development to make decisions for us.
CardiffCreature June 4, 2013 at 10:44 am
Prop A will not control growth. It will make sure that BOTH the council and the public get toRead More directly weigh in on the deals being brokered between big developers and the city. This won't end the indirect developer subsidies, but it sure will help.
Lynn Marr June 6, 2013 at 02:26 am
Yes, it will help to slow growth, by making sure that the public approves raising height limits orRead More upzoning, for developments over the parameters of a MAXIMUM of 30 ft. and two stories. Lower set height limits will not be repealed, because they are not in conflict with the initiative or the General Plan. David Ahlgren's fear and speculation is not backed up by one single fact. He just raises the usual building industry "mantra" of alleged risks created by unnamed "unintended consequences." Council's attempt at a preemptive ordinance does NOT guarantee that will be placed on the ballot in 2014, and does NOT eliminate other loopholes such as the "less-than-5-acre" exception, the "categorization of intensity of use" exception, and the height limit exception. The only loophole that Council's drafted ordinance affects is Council's ability to vote by a 4/5 supermajority on upzoing if it is done with respect to a "significant public benefit." Not only is Council's recently drafted ordinance NOT guaranteed, in that a future Council could reverse it, if it is not enacted through a public vote, but also Council's attempt at preempting the "right to vote on upzoning and raising height limits initiative" DOESN"T eliminate the other loopholes that still exist in our General Plan, Policy 3.12., which exceptions I've spelled out, here.