An unprecedented drop in California's child population coupled with a growing wave of Baby Boomer retirements has major implications for the state and should drive lawmakers to adopt policies that will nurture young people with improved educational opportunities and healthcare, according to a report released Tuesday.
An analysis of census data shows that children will make up 21 percent of the state's population by 2030, down sharply from 33 percent in 1970, according to the report by USC's Price School of Public Policy and the Lucille Packard Foundation for Children's Health.
Several factors are behind California's shrinking child population, including declining birth rates, fewer newcomers coming to the state and a smaller number of women of childbearing age, said Dowell Myers, professor of policy and demography and director of USC's Population Dynamics Research Group.
"These trends are not yet widely recognized, but they should be a wake- up call for policymakers," Myers said. "We will be increasingly dependent economically and socially on a smaller number of children. They are more important to the state's future success than ever before."
Birth rates have declined in all major racial and ethnic groups in California since 2000 and are below the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman, according to the report.
Additionally, more than 20 percent of the state's children live in households that are below the federal poverty level, and poverty rates are twice as high for California's children as they are for adults, the study found.
Another key trend noted in the report involves the number of children born and raised in California compared to those from out of state.
More than 90 percent of the state's children under 10 are home grown, a reversal from previous decades, which will force the state to rely more heavily on the abilities of its native-born children, according to a statement accompanying the study.
"The majority of the next generation of workers will have been shaped by California's health and education systems," Myers said. "It's essential that we nurture our human capital."
The study found that California will have 36 seniors per 100 working adults by 2030, as compared to the 21 seniors per 100 working adults the state has averaged since 1970. Additionally, it found that nearly half of school-age children are being raised in households where English is not the primary language, and they may need tailored social, health and educational services in the short term so that potential benefits of their bilingual abilities can be realized.
"All of these findings make a compelling argument that our policies and programs increasingly must support the health, education and well being of the state's children, said Dr. David Alexander, president and CEO of the Lucille Packard Foundation for Children's Health, which funded the study.
"In particular, we must address the growing rates of child poverty and the persistent child health disparities found in ethnic and racial groups."
The full report is available at www.kidsdata.org/childpop.
4:33 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013 "Not to worry, 3,658,965 Mexicans are going to become legal in the state this year and we know how they produce." . . You do realize that citizenship status is not a factor in determining population?
6:00 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013 "Everyone knows that our State Government has literally ran corporate companies out of CA, with them they took their tax base." . . We should get Apple to relocate from San Jose to California!
6:26 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013 "When the EPA comes in and inspects your place of business and wants permits for recycling beads out of your bead blaster, things are out of hand." . . Instead we should trust businesses to do what is right for the environment? Contrary to what you would like us to believe, we do have experience of living in a country where there were no environmental laws.
6:53 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013 "We are outnumbered by the takers. " . . I'll ask again, but I am sure that I will not get an answer. Can you detail exactly who these "takers" are and their exact percentage of the population?
8:39 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013 "Perhaps fewer people are having children because they believe this is not a suitable place to raise children any more." . . Or the Catholic church has lost influence as Hispanics assimilate into our culture.
9:44 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013 "people are leaving to states with lower costs of living .... I was just in Nevada, paid $3.01 a gallon of gas" . . Do you really think that people are leaving for Nevada. Their housing market is in worse shape than ours.
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2012/04/u-haul-rates-confirm-california-exodus.html Facts are facts Carl ...
9:54 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013 "they ARE going to Nevada, you can buy a house there quite cheap with payments much less than rent here" . . Aren't housing prices subject to supply and demand? If there were a huge influx of people going into the state, wouldn't the prices rise? No matter what the cost of housing, you still have to get a job and Nevada had the worst unemployment rate in the country. http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm
9:54 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013 "They are moving mainly to Texas .." . . But then you have to live in Texas...
This is just state debt http://sbaction.org/sbAction/WallofDebt?1=1 now add every city, county, school and water district, all of their bonds ... the debt must be over a trillion bucks ... with industry moving out with their high paying jobs how will California get past this ? States can't go bankrupt ... they can't print money either
8:18 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013 "I think the catholic church losing influence is a win for everyone." . . Look - we agree on something.
8:21 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013 " I wonder how many people are moving to Texas because they are campaigning to seceed from the US and they think they might just succeed." . . Would they go it alone or take Mississippi and the rest of the wealth sucking red states with them?