.
Feedback

Tax Rules for Charitable Contributions

Charitable donations are common at year's end. The IRS offers some general rules if your donation goal is a legitimate tax deduction.

Editor's Note: I've disabled comments for this blog post at the blogger's request because the comments are not relevant to the post and notifications are flooding his inbox. 

Many taxpayers look to lower their tax bill as the year winds down. One of the more popular ways to do that is through charitable contributions. If your goal is a legitimate tax deduction through a cash or non-cash donation or donations, then read on for some highlights of the rules. In my next blog post, I’ll offer a few other common ideas to consider for year-end tax reduction.

You may claim a charitable donation deduction only if you itemize on IRS Schedule A. In other words, if you do not itemize your deductions, then you normally do not realize a tax benefit. For more on taking the standard deduction (based on your filing status) vs. itemizing, read here. In addition, you cannot deduct contributions made to specific individuals, political organizations or candidates.

Be sure you are giving to a qualified public charity. The IRS has a useful feature called Select Check that can help you in that regard. Select Check allows you to select an exempt organization (charity) and check certain information about its federal tax status and filings.

Contributions made on or before Dec. 31, 2012 are considered deductible for the 2012 tax year. Also, checks mailed or donations charged to a credit card by Dec. 31, 2012, are generally considered to be deductible in 2012.

If you receive a benefit because of your contribution such as merchandise, tickets to a ball game or other goods and services, then you can deduct only the amount that exceeds the fair market value of the benefit received.

Donations of stock or other non-cash property are usually valued at the fair market value of the property. Clothing and household items must generally be in good used condition or better to be deductible. Special rules apply to vehicle donations. (Fair market value is generally the price at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither having to buy or sell, and both having reasonable knowledge of all the relevant facts.)

Keep a paper trail such as receipts and paperwork for substantiation. If you claim a deduction for contributions of cash or property equaling $250 or more, you must have a bank record, payroll deduction records or a written acknowledgment from the qualified organization.

For text message donations, a telephone bill meets the record-keeping requirement if it shows the name of the receiving organization, the date of the contribution and the amount given.

Finally, if your total deduction for all noncash contributions for the year is more than $500, you must complete and attach IRS Form 8283, Noncash Charitable Contributions, to your return. Taxpayers donating an item or a group of similar items valued at more than $5,000 must also complete Section B of Form 8283, which generally requires an appraisal by a qualified appraiser.

IRS Publication 526, Charitable Contributions—linked above in several spots—is an excellent resource for all the details involved in charitable giving. Also, check out our YouTube videos on the subject as well: Fair Market Value of Charitable Contributions and Charitable Contributions.

Raphael Tulino is the IRS spokesperson for Southern California and Nevada.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Encinitas Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jodina Hahn Gallo May 21, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Ciao Pam! Grazie per il tuo bel commento! / Thanks for your nice comment! Hope your trip to ItaliaRead More was fabulous. Buona giornata :)
Pam May 21, 2013 at 06:52 am
Took this class before a trip to Italy. Very fun and was able to learn quickly with the way theRead More class was taught. Great instructor and wonderful insights. You will enjoy it if you ever wanted to learn Italian. Caio!
ron ranson May 21, 2013 at 09:34 am
This is wonderful news. Congratulations to the students, their instructors and Academy staffRead More members -- and to the supportive parents. A theatre education is the best!
Daniel Woolfolk (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 03:08 pm
Hi Edward, I didn't hear any reports on the scanner or from sources of crashes, rescues or hardRead More landings.
John E May 20, 2013 at 09:33 am
The public deserves an objective, unemotional, factual public debate on this proposition. So far IRead More am still leaning toward a yes vote, but I am keeping an open mind at least through this month.
Jac Flanders May 21, 2013 at 10:49 pm
Thanks for your comment, Frank. I'm certain you're not the only grownup reader of the blog - justRead More the only one so far. (At first, I thought some guys were putting me on; they have to be kidding.) You're right, of course, some Democrats voted against the E.R.A. for women. Shamefully, they and a majority of Republicans have defeated each attempt to pass the amendment so far. I still find it almost unbelievable that some of our neighbors think women do not deserve equal rights under the law. I thought that kind of thinking existed only in Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, and some backwoods places in Tennessee.
Status Quo May 21, 2013 at 03:40 pm
'Frank H. Robles', I emplore you from your inference, please quit treating women as 2nd classRead More citizens as your start, toward equal rights and improvement of your relationships to women. This act alone, renders bestowing inordinate Rights or extralegal treatment of women as a group - moot, and aligned with our(American) precepts - as it is wholly unneeded under our Constitution at this time - hopefully, for all time.
Batman May 21, 2013 at 01:04 pm
Women are in a subordinate role to men for a reason. The responsibilty of bearing and caring forRead More children makes it difficult if not impossible for a woman to support herself during that time. It is the man's responsibility to do this. So for good reason women look for reliable men to to take care of them. In the absence of reliable men big government steps in and becomes the husband. Destruction of the family and ultimately our nation is the objective of women's lib. If you don't like The USA try places like Saudi Arabia where women are treated as livestock. (The Saudis and many other Islamic nations would very much like to take over the USA). Leave it to a sick puppy like Jac Flanders to spatter his verbal vomit all over the message boards. And the indecated masses lap it up like candy
Frank H. Robles May 20, 2013 at 11:48 am
Stopped by Sunday to take a Look, very nice homes, good location, fair asking price, should sellRead More well...!!!
Sallie Mazzur January 28, 2013 at 11:39 pm
Well said, Nama. I was speechless to see how many people Uncle Ben had influenced during his life,Read More but it's no wonder. There may be one less Ben Taylor in our lives, but Heaven just got a whole lot more fun!
Daniel Woolfolk (Editor) January 24, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Thanks, Kyle for posting this. I'm not sure how things were in the past, but as a Patch editor, I'veRead More seen that blogging and engaging readers directly is a great way to market a book. Steve Repak, a financial planner with a military-themed personal finance book, blogs regularly on Patch and has recently been featured in National Media. Here's that story: http://oceanside-camppendleton.patch.com/articles/steve-repak-featured-on-npr-fox-friends